Literature DB >> 23915054

The dissociation between early and late selection in older adults.

Brittany R Alperin1, Anna E Haring, Tatyana Y Zhuravleva, Phillip J Holcomb, Dorene M Rentz, Kirk R Daffner.   

Abstract

Older adults exhibit a reduced ability to ignore task-irrelevant stimuli; however, it remains to be determined where along the information processing stream the most salient age-associated changes occur. In the current study, ERPs provided an opportunity to determine whether age-related differences in processing task-irrelevant stimuli were uniform across information processing stages or disproportionately affected either early or late selection. ERPs were measured in young and old adults during a color-selective attention task in which participants responded to target letters in a specified color (attend condition) while ignoring letters in a different color (ignore condition). Old participants were matched to two groups of young participants on the basis of neuropsychological test performance: one using age-appropriate norms and the other using test scores not adjusted for age. There were no age-associated differences in the magnitude of early selection (attend-ignore), as indexed by the size of the anterior selection positivity and posterior selection negativity. During late selection, as indexed by P3b amplitude, both groups of young participants generated neural responses to target letters under the attend versus ignore conditions that were highly differentiated. In striking contrast, old participants generated a P3b to target letters with no reliable differences between conditions. Individuals who were slow to initiate early selection appeared to be less successful at executing late selection. Despite relative preservation of the operations of early selection, processing delays may lead older participants to allocate excessive resources to task-irrelevant stimuli during late selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23915054      PMCID: PMC4642708          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  75 in total

1.  Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  T Curran; A Hills; M B Patterson; M E Strauss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Age differences in task switching and response monitoring: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Ben Eppinger; Jutta Kray; Axel Mecklinger; Oliver John
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Normal aging delays and compromises early multifocal visual attention during object tracking.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; Shu-Chen Li; Hauke R Heekeren; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload.

Authors:  Matthew W Miller; Jeremy C Rietschel; Craig G McDonald; Bradley D Hatfield
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 6.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes.

Authors:  P Anderer; H V Semlitsch; B Saletu
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11

8.  Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging?

Authors:  P B Baltes; U Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-03

9.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults.

Authors:  A E Haring; T Y Zhuravleva; B R Alperin; D M Rentz; P J Holcomb; K R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  10 in total

1.  The impact of executive capacity and age on mechanisms underlying multidimensional feature selection.

Authors:  Katherine K Mott; Brittany R Alperin; Anne M Fox; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Multiple identity tracking strategies vary by age: An ERP study.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Audrey Duarte; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Investigating age-related changes in anterior and posterior neural activity throughout the information processing stream.

Authors:  Brittany R Alperin; Erich S Tusch; Katherine K Mott; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Age-related decline in differentiated neural responses to rare target versus frequent standard stimuli.

Authors:  Katherine K Mott; Brittany R Alperin; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Age-related differences in the automatic processing of single letters: implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Brittany R Alperin; Katherine K Mott; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Investigating the age-related "anterior shift" in the scalp distribution of the P3b component using principal component analysis.

Authors:  Brittany R Alperin; Katherine K Mott; Dorene M Rentz; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity.

Authors:  Sharon S Simon; Erich S Tusch; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Increased Early Processing of Task-Irrelevant Auditory Stimuli in Older Adults.

Authors:  Erich S Tusch; Brittany R Alperin; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the use of the P300 as a tool for cognitive processing assessment in healthy aging: A review.

Authors:  Sofia Cristina Iost Pavarini; Allan Gustavo Brigola; Bruna Moretti Luchesi; Érica Nestor Souza; Estefani Serafim Rossetti; Francisco José Fraga; Letícia Pimenta Costa Guarisco; Marélli Terassi; Nathalia Alves Oliveira; Priscilla Hortense; Renata Valle Pedroso; Ana Carolina Ottaviani
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

10.  Age Effects on Distraction in a Visual Task Requiring Fast Reactions: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Petia Kojouharova; Zsófia Anna Gaál; Boglárka Nagy; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.750

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.