Literature DB >> 17004866

Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics.

Eric J Hanly1, Brian E Miller, Rajesh Kumar, Christopher J Hasser, Eve Coste-Maniere, Mark A Talamini, Alexander A Aurora, Noah S Schenkman, Michael R Marohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most significant limitations of surgical robots has been their inability to allow multiple surgeons and surgeons-in-training to engage in collaborative control of robotic surgical instruments. We report the initial experience with a novel two-headed da Vinci surgical robot that has two collaborative modes: the "swap" mode allows two surgeons to simultaneously operate and actively swap control of the robot's four arms, and the "nudge" mode allows them to share control of two of the robot's arms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The utility of the mentoring console operating in its two collaborative modes was evaluated through a combination of dry laboratory exercises and animal laboratory surgery. The results from surgeon-resident collaborative performance of complex three-handed surgical tasks were compared to results from single-surgeon and single-resident performance. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test.
RESULTS: Collaborative surgeon-resident swap control reduced the time to completion of complex three-handed surgical tasks by 25% compared to single-surgeon operation of a four-armed da Vinci (P < 0.01) and by 34% compared to single-resident operation (P < 0.001). While swap mode was found to be most helpful during parts of surgical procedures that require multiple hands (such as isolation and division of vessels), nudge mode was particularly useful for guiding a resident's hands during crucially precise steps of an operation (such as proper placement of stitches).
CONCLUSION: The da Vinci mentoring console greatly facilitates surgeon collaboration during robotic surgery and improves the performance of complex surgical tasks. The mentoring console has the potential to improve resident participation in surgical robotics cases, enhance resident education in surgical training programs engaged in surgical robotics, and improve patient safety during robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17004866     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  15 in total

Review 1.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

2.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robotics and surgery: A sustainable relationship?

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Impact of robotic single and dual console systems in the training of minimally invasive gynecology surgery (MIGS) fellows.

Authors:  Mateo G Leon; Aakriti R Carrubba; Christopher C DeStephano; Michael G Heckman; Emily C Craver; Tri A Dinh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 6.  Robotic lung cancer surgery: review of experience and costs.

Authors:  Pierluigi Novellis; Marco Alloisio; Elena Vanni; Edoardo Bottoni; Umberto Cariboni; Giulia Veronesi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Kim Le; Annika Deitermann; Enid Montague
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.

Authors:  Monica S C Morgan; Nabeel A Shakir; Maurilio Garcia-Gil; Asim Ozayar; Jeffrey C Gahan; Justin I Friedlander; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Collaborative gaze channelling for improved cooperation during robotic assisted surgery.

Authors:  Ka-Wai Kwok; Loi-Wah Sun; George P Mylonas; David R C James; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Comparing the da Vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques.

Authors:  Salvatore Crusco; Tiffany Jackson; Arnold Advincula
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.