Literature DB >> 17004475

The spatial unmasking of speech: evidence for better-ear listening.

Barrie A Edmonds1, John F Culling.   

Abstract

Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for target speech presented concurrently with interfering speech (spoken by a different speaker). In experiment 1, the target and interferer were divided spectrally into high- and low-frequency bands and presented over headphones in three conditions: monaural, dichotic (target and interferer to different ears), and swapped (the low-frequency target band and the high-frequency interferer band were presented to one ear, while the high-frequency target band and the low-frequency interferer band were presented to the other ear). SRTs were highest in the monaural condition and lowest in the dichotic condition; SRTs in the swapped condition were intermediate. In experiment 2, two new conditions were devised such that one target band was presented in isolation to one ear while the other band was presented at the other ear with the interferer. The pattern of SRTs observed in experiment 2 suggests that performance in the swapped condition reflects the intelligibility of the target frequency bands at just one ear; the auditory system appears unable to exploit advantageous target-to-interferer ratios at different ears when segregating target speech from a competing speech interferer.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17004475     DOI: 10.1121/1.2228573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Caitlin Corkhill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Simultaneous Assessment of Speech Identification and Spatial Discrimination: A Potential Testing Approach for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Naomi Elliott; Katherine C Wood; Deborah A Vickers
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Speech in noise perception improved by training fine auditory discrimination: far and applicable transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Tingting Yan; Ting Huang; Xiaoli Li; Yu-Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Validity and reliability of the Persian version of spatial hearing questionnaire.

Authors:  Maryam Delphi; Farzaneh Zamiri Abdolahi; Richard Tyler; Mahsa Bakhit; Nader Saki; Ahmad Reza Nazeri
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-07-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.