Literature DB >> 17004106

MDA-MB-435 cells are derived from M14 melanoma cells--a loss for breast cancer, but a boon for melanoma research.

James M Rae1, Chad J Creighton, Jeanne M Meck, Bassem R Haddad, Michael D Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The tissue of origin of the cell line MDA-MB-435 has been a matter of debate since analysis of DNA microarray data led Ross et al. (2000, Nat Genet 24(3):227-235) to suggest they might be of melanocyte origin due to their similarity to melanoma cell lines. We have previously shown that MDA-MB-435 cells maintained in multiple laboratories are of common origin to those used by Ross et al. and concluded that MDA-MB-435 cells are not a representative model for breast cancer. We could not determine, however, whether the melanoma-like properties of the MDA-MB-435 cell line are the result of misclassification or due to transdifferention to a melanoma-like phenotype.
METHODS: We used karyotype, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and microsatalite polymorphism analyses, combined with bioinformatics analysis of gene expression and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, to test the hypothesis that the MDA-MB-435 cell line is derived from the melanoma cell line M14.
RESULTS: We show that the MDA-MB-435 and M14 cell lines are essentially identical with respect to cytogenetic characteristics as well as gene expression patterns and that the minor differences found can be explained by phenotypic and genotypic clonal drift.
CONCLUSIONS: All currently available stocks of MDA-MB-435 cells are derived from the M14 melanoma cell line and can no longer be considered a model of breast cancer. These cells are still a valuable system for the study of cancer metastasis and the extensive literature using these cells since 1982 represent a valuable new resource for the melanoma research community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17004106     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9392-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  184 in total

1.  siRNA-mediated down-regulation of P-glycoprotein in a Xenograft tumor model in NOD-SCID mice.

Authors:  Meysam Abbasi; Hamidreza Montazeri Aliabadi; Elaine H Moase; Afsaneh Lavasanifar; Kamaljit Kaur; Raymond Lai; Charles Doillon; Hasan Uludağ
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Primary cilia are decreased in breast cancer: analysis of a collection of human breast cancer cell lines and tissues.

Authors:  Kun Yuan; Natalya Frolova; Yi Xie; Dezhi Wang; Leah Cook; Yeon-Jin Kwon; Adam D Steg; Rosa Serra; Andra R Frost
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Integrin β4 regulates SPARC protein to promote invasion.

Authors:  Kristin D Gerson; Jeffrey R Shearstone; V S R Krishna Maddula; Bruce E Seligmann; Arthur M Mercurio
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Positive feedback between Dia1, LARG, and RhoA regulates cell morphology and invasion.

Authors:  Thomas M Kitzing; Arul S Sahadevan; Dominique T Brandt; Helga Knieling; Sebastian Hannemann; Oliver T Fackler; Jörg Grosshans; Robert Grosse
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  In vivo animal models for studying brain metastasis: value and limitations.

Authors:  Inderjit Daphu; Terje Sundstrøm; Sindre Horn; Peter C Huszthy; Simone P Niclou; Per Ø Sakariassen; Heike Immervoll; Hrvoje Miletic; Rolf Bjerkvig; Frits Thorsen
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Over-expression of the BRMS1 family member SUDS3 does not suppress metastasis of human cancer cells.

Authors:  Alexandra C Silveira; Douglas R Hurst; Kedar S Vaidya; Donald E Ayer; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Antitumor efficacy testing in rodents.

Authors:  Melinda G Hollingshead
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Noninvasive imaging of tumor integrin expression using (18)F-labeled RGD dimer peptide with PEG (4) linkers.

Authors:  Zhaofei Liu; Shuanglong Liu; Fan Wang; Shuang Liu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Epigenetic silencing contributes to the loss of BRMS1 expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Brandon J Metge; Andra R Frost; Judy A King; Donna Lynn Dyess; Danny R Welch; Rajeev S Samant; Lalita A Shevde
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 10.  Influence of diet on metastasis and tumor dormancy.

Authors:  Ann F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.