Literature DB >> 17002841

Teaching and assessing surgical competence.

W E G Thomas1.   

Abstract

Surgical competence and its assessment is one of the most hotly debated topics engaging the profession. In the current climate of diminishing working hours and shorter training, the surgical profession is having to address the complex issue as to how surgery as a craft specialty should be taught, and how to assess when an individual is competent within their chosen sphere as well as how that competence should be maintained. Internationally, there is political pressure upon the professional to achieve contracted activity to comply with political imperatives and, at the same time, to achieve a greater degree of specialisation. Within Europe, the working time directive has led to a shift system of rotas and this, along with a shorter overall period of training, has led to reduced time available to surgical trainees in which to learn their craft.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17002841      PMCID: PMC1964676          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X116927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Competencies required to be a competent surgeon.

Authors:  C S Galasko
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Core skills, courses and competency.

Authors:  W E Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Basic surgical skills courses: an educational success story.

Authors:  B Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Assessing the technical skills of surgical trainees.

Authors:  J D Beard; B C Jolly; D I Newble; W E G Thomas; J Donnelly; L J Southgate
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Surgeons: employees or professionals?

Authors:  Josef E Fischer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Developing assessments of surgical skills for the GMC Performance Procedures.

Authors:  Jonathan D Beard; Brian C Jolly; Lesley J Southgate; David I Newble; E G Thomas; John Rochester
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  General surgical training--improvements and problems. Vascular Advisory Committee of the Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J H Wolfe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  A Simulation-based, cognitive assessment of resident decision making during complex urinary catheterization scenarios.

Authors:  Jay N Nathwani; Katherine E Law; Anna K Witt; R D Ray; S M DiMarco; C M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Michael G C Pellen; Liam F Horgan; J Roger Barton; Stephen E Attwood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [The competent surgeon. Bridging the gap between undergraduate final year and postgraduate surgery training].

Authors:  M Kadmon; P Ganschow; S Gillen; H S Hofmann; N Braune; J Johannink; P Kühn; H J Buhr; P O Berberat
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Neonatal-perinatal medicine fellow procedural experience and competency determination: results of a national survey.

Authors:  T Sawyer; H French; A Ades; L Johnston
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Diagnostic flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy: development of a procedure specific assessment tool using a Delphi methodology.

Authors:  Jacob Melchiors; Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen; Frederik G Dikkers; Javier Gavilán; J Pieter Noordzij; Marvin P Fried; Daniel Novakovic; Johannes Fagan; Birgitte W Charabi; Lars Konge; Christian von Buchwald
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Knowing the operative game plan: a novel tool for the assessment of surgical procedural knowledge.

Authors:  Jacques Balayla; Simon Bergman; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Liane S Feldman; Shannon A Fraser
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Defining competencies for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  Madoka Takao; Elif Bilgic; Kevin Waschke; Pepa Kaneva; Satoshi Endo; Yoshiko Nakano; Shinwa Tanaka; Yoshinori Morita; Takashi Toyonaga; Eiji Umegaki; Yuzo Kodama; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Assessing surgical competence: A challenge.

Authors:  Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

9.  The Basic Surgical Skills Course in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Observational Study of Effectiveness.

Authors:  Stuart J Fergusson; David M Sedgwick; Georges Ntakiyiruta; Faustin Ntirenganya
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher Jd Wallis; Bheeshma Ravi; Natalie Coburn; Robert K Nam; Allan S Detsky; Raj Satkunasivam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.