Literature DB >> 17001266

Productivity and turnover in PCPs: the role of staff participation in decision-making.

Dorothy Y Hung1, Thomas G Rundall, Deborah J Cohen, Alfred F Tallia, Benjamin F Crabtree.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efforts to redesign primary care practices are beginning to address how decisions are made in the practice setting. This study contributes to these efforts by examining associations between staff participation in decision-making, productivity, and turnover in primary care practices. The study is informed by organizational theories of participation that emphasize cognitive and affective influences on employee output and behavior.
METHODS: This research used data collected from primary care practices involved in a national initiative sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Cross-sectional survey data on organizational structures and attributes among 49 practices were analyzed. Regression analysis was used to examine associations among practice productivity, staff participation in decision-making, and formal structures such as staff meetings. Associations between staff turnover and participative decision-making were also examined.
RESULTS: Staff participation in decisions regarding quality improvement, practice change, and clinical operations was positively associated with practice productivity, whereas formal structures such as staff meetings were not. In addition, higher levels of participation in decision-making were associated with reduced turnover among nonclinicians and administrative staff.
CONCLUSION: Examination of organizational features is increasingly recognized as a key to improving primary care performance. Study findings suggest that one important strategy may be implementation of a participative model emphasizing greater staff involvement in practice decisions. This may enhance information-sharing, work satisfaction, and commitment to organizational decisions, all of which can lead to beneficial outcomes such as increased productivity and stability in primary care practices.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17001266     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220828.43049.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  3 in total

1.  A business case for quality improvement in addiction treatment: evidence from the NIATx collaborative.

Authors:  Andrew R Quanbeck; Lynn Madden; Eldon Edmundson; James H Ford; K John McConnell; Dennis McCarty; David H Gustafson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Up close and (inter)personal: insights from a primary care practice's efforts to improve office relationships over time, 2003-2009.

Authors:  Jenna Howard; Eric K Shaw; Elizabeth Clark; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.926

3.  The impact of electronic health records and teamwork on diabetes care quality.

Authors:  Ilana Graetz; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Stephen M Shortell; Thomas G Rundall; Jim Bellows; John Hsu; Marc Jaffe; Mary E Reed
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.229

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.