Literature DB >> 17000650

Parental desire and acceptability of spermatogonial stem cell cryopreservation in boys with cancer.

H van den Berg1, S Repping, F van der Veen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the near future, a substantial proportion of adults will be childhood cancer survivors. The cryopreservation and transplantation of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) is currently successful in animals; application in humans seems likely in the near future. Cryopreserving SSCs might become an important issue in childhood cancer. Because this might require testicular biopsies or hemicastration, parental desire/acceptability for SSC collection was enquired for.
METHODS: Three hundred eighteen parents of boys surviving at least 2 years after the diagnosis of cancer were asked about collecting SSCs by biopsy or hemicastration and collecting sperm by masturbation or electrostimulation. Opinions were assessed as if at the time of diagnosis and at the present time.
RESULTS: Sixty-three per cent of parents responded. At diagnosis, SSC collection by means of biopsy was approved by 61%, hemicastration by 33% and collecting sperm by 70% (P < 0.013). The acceptability of performing hemicastration was significantly lower than all other forms of SSC/sperm collection. No differences were observed between parents' present opinion and opinion at diagnosis. No differences related to treatment intensity, presumed negative fertility effects and pubertal state were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Infertility is a major topic for parents. For prepubertal boys, the collection of SSCs might be a great relief in respect of the fertility issue. Collecting SSCs by biopsy is desired and accepted by the majority of parents; hemicastration is accepted by one-third of parents. The translation of SSC cryopreservation and transplantation from animal models to humans is eagerly awaited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000650     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  17 in total

Review 1.  Multi-scale heat and mass transfer modelling of cell and tissue cryopreservation.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Sangjun Moon; Xiaohui Zhang; Lei Shao; Young Seok Song; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Fertility Preservation after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Adolescents', Parents', and Providers' Perspectives, Experiences, and Preferences.

Authors:  Julia F Taylor; Mary A Ott
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 3.  Choosing life when facing death: understanding fertility preservation decision-making for cancer patients.

Authors:  Shauna L Gardino; Linda L Emanuel
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

4.  WOMEN AND MEN WITH CANCER AND A FUTURE DESIRE FOR CHILDREN - WHAT SHOULD CLINICIANS CONSIDER IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC TIMES?

Authors:  S Findeklee; M Kasoha; J C Radosa; M P Radosa; B Haj Hamoud; R M Sima
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

5.  Evaluation of ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation in children undergoing gonadotoxic therapies.

Authors:  Samir N Babayev; Erol Arslan; Stanley Kogan; Fred Moy; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Attitudes of parents of Klinefelter boys and pediatricians towards neonatal screening and fertility preservation techniques in Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  Inge Gies; Herman Tournaye; Jean De Schepper
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  An experimental protocol for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys recently diagnosed with cancer: a report of acceptability and safety.

Authors:  J P Ginsberg; C A Carlson; K Lin; W L Hobbie; E Wigo; X Wu; R L Brinster; T F Kolon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Fertility preservation for boys with cancer.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Fujita; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-07

Review 9.  Testicular tissue cryopreservation and spermatogonial stem cell transplantation to restore fertility: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Hooman Sadri-Ardekani; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 10.  Restoring fertility in sterile childhood cancer survivors by autotransplanting spermatogonial stem cells: are we there yet?

Authors:  Robert B Struijk; Callista L Mulder; Fulco van der Veen; Ans M M van Pelt; Sjoerd Repping
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.