Literature DB >> 19861330

An experimental protocol for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys recently diagnosed with cancer: a report of acceptability and safety.

J P Ginsberg1, C A Carlson, K Lin, W L Hobbie, E Wigo, X Wu, R L Brinster, T F Kolon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gonadal damage is a consequence of therapy for pediatric malignancies. Prepubertal males have no semen or mature spermatozoa, posing a challenge for fertility preservation. Testicular tissue cryopreservation is a potential option but is still experimental. We report on a pilot protocol that offered testicular biopsy cryopreservation to families of prepubertal boys with newly diagnosed malignancy. The aims were to determine the acceptability and safety of this procedure.
METHODS: Parents of prepubertal boys with diagnoses at highest risk for treatment-related gonadal damage were offered the option of testicular cryopreservation. Half of the biopsy was frozen for the subject's potential future use and the remainder used for research. Data on negative intraoperative and/or 7 day post-operative sequelae of testicular biopsies were assessed. Two to four weeks later, parents were asked to complete a questionnaire on factors influencing their decision to have the biopsy or not.
RESULTS: Since January 2008, 24 boys have met the eligibility criteria but three required immediate treatment and were excluded. Sixteen of 21 families (76%) consented to testicular biopsy, indicating the prospective acceptability of this option to parents of boys aged 3 months to 14 years; 14 underwent the procedure without any negative intra- or post-operative sequelae. Although the time at diagnosis is stressful, families can give thoughtful consideration to this option. Factors such as religion, finance, ethics and the experimental nature of cryopreservation did not play a major role in decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents of prepubertal boys with cancer are willing to pursue testicular tissue cryopreservation at diagnosis, and testicular biopsy caused no acute adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861330      PMCID: PMC2794668          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  27 in total

Review 1.  Late effects of the treatment of childhood cancer on the female reproductive system and the potential for fertility preservation.

Authors:  Louise E Bath; W Hamish B Wallace; Hilary O D Critchley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Testicular tissue cryopreservation in boys. Ethical and legal issues: case report.

Authors:  G Bahadur; R Chatterjee; D Ralph
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Methods of cryopreservation of testicular tissue with viable spermatogonia in pre-pubertal boys undergoing gonadotoxic cancer treatment.

Authors:  Victoria Keros; Kjell Hultenby; Birgit Borgström; Margareta Fridström; Kirsi Jahnukainen; Outi Hovatta
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Testicular function following chemotherapy.

Authors:  S J Howell; S M Shalet
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Kimberly Brey; Alan Lichtin; Larry I Lipshultz; Sima Jeha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Parental desire and acceptability of spermatogonial stem cell cryopreservation in boys with cancer.

Authors:  H van den Berg; S Repping; F van der Veen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Spermatogonial survival after cryopreservation and short-term orthotopic immature human cryptorchid testicular tissue grafting to immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  Christine Wyns; Mara Curaba; Belen Martinez-Madrid; Anne Van Langendonckt; Wese François-Xavier; Jacques Donnez
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Sperm banking for adolescent and young adult cancer patients: sperm quality, patient, and parent perspectives.

Authors:  Jill P Ginsberg; Susan K Ogle; Lisa K Tuchman; Claire A Carlson; Maureen M Reilly; Wendy L Hobbie; Mary Rourke; Huaqing Zhao; Anna T Meadows
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 9.  Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Late mortality experience in five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  A C Mertens; Y Yasui; J P Neglia; J D Potter; M E Nesbit; K Ruccione; W A Smithson; L L Robison
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 50.717

View more
  57 in total

1.  Best of the AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights From the 2011 American Urological Association Meeting, May 14-19, 2011, Washington, DC.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer; Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin; Jayabalan Nirmal; Michael B Chancellor; J Curtis Nickel; Jacob Rajfer; Ellen Shapiro; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

2.  Male reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Lisa B Kenney; Laurie E Cohen; Margarett Shnorhavorian; Monika L Metzger; Barbara Lockart; Nobuko Hijiya; Eileen Duffey-Lind; Louis Constine; Daniel Green; Lillian Meacham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A future, on ice.

Authors:  Alison McCook
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Separating spermatogonia from cancer cells in contaminated prepubertal primate testis cell suspensions.

Authors:  Brian P Hermann; Meena Sukhwani; Jennifer Salati; Yi Sheng; Tianjiao Chu; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Therapies for multiple sclerosis: considerations in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  Brenda Banwell; Amit Bar-Or; Gavin Giovannoni; Russell C Dale; Marc Tardieu
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prevents loss of spermatogenesis after sterilizing busulfan chemotherapy.

Authors:  Roberto Benavides-Garcia; Rose Joachim; Nancy A Pina; Kazadi N Mutoji; Matthew A Reilly; Brian P Hermann
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Testicular tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal male children: an analysis of parental decision-making.

Authors:  Jill P Ginsberg; Yimei Li; Claire A Carlson; Clarisa R Gracia; Wendy L Hobbie; Victoria A Miller; John Mulhall; Margarett Shnorhavorian; Ralph L Brinster; Thomas F Kolon
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Evaluation of ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation in children undergoing gonadotoxic therapies.

Authors:  Samir N Babayev; Erol Arslan; Stanley Kogan; Fred Moy; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Future Directions in Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation: A Report from the 2011 Oncofertility Consortium Conference.

Authors:  Kate E Waimey; Francesca E Duncan; H Irene Su; Kristin Smith; Harlan Wallach; Kemi Jona; Christos Coutifaris; Clarisa R Gracia; Lonnie D Shea; Robert E Brannigan; R Jeffrey Chang; Mary B Zelinski; Richard L Stouffer; Robert L Taylor; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 10.  Spermatogonial stem cell regulation and spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Bart T Phillips; Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.