Literature DB >> 18439555

Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

William A Grobman1, Yinglei Lai, Mark B Landon, Catherine Y Spong, Kenneth J Leveno, Dwight J Rouse, Michael W Varner, Atef H Moawad, Steve N Caritis, Margaret Harper, Ronald J Wapner, Yoram Sorokin, Menachem Miodovnik, Marshall Carpenter, Mary J O'Sullivan, Baha M Sibai, Oded Langer, John M Thorp, Susan M Ramin, Brian M Mercer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a model that predicts individual-specific risk of uterine rupture during an attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: Women with 1 previous low-transverse cesarean delivery who underwent a trial of labor with a term singleton were identified in a concurrently collected database of deliveries that occurred at 19 academic centers during a 4-year period. We analyzed different classification techniques in an effort to develop an accurate prediction model for uterine rupture.
RESULTS: Of the 11,855 women who were available for analysis, 83 women (0.7%) had had a uterine rupture. The optimal final prediction model, which was based on a logistic regression, included 2 variables: any previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71) and induction of labor (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.11-2.69). This model, with a c-statistic of 0.627, had poor discriminating ability and did not allow the determination of a clinically useful estimate of the probability of uterine rupture for an individual patient.
CONCLUSION: Factors that were available before or at admission for delivery cannot be used to predict accurately the relatively small proportion of women at term who will experience a uterine rupture during an attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439555      PMCID: PMC2532505          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.

Authors:  C M Zelop; T D Shipp; J T Repke; A Cohen; E Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Paré; Joanne N Quiñones; George A Macones
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; John C Hauth; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Leindecker; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?

Authors:  George A Macones; Alison G Cahill; David M Stamilio; Anthony Odibo; Jeffrey Peipert; Erika J Stevens
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Identifying combinations of cancer markers for further study as triggers of early intervention.

Authors:  S G Baker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study.

Authors:  A S Leung; R M Farmer; E K Leung; A L Medearis; R H Paul
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Michelle Berlin; Marian McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Benjamin Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Hyagriv N Simhan; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  What We Have Learned About Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; William A Grobman
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Predicting Successful Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems.

Authors:  Mayur Dilipbhai Patel; Nandita Maitra; Purvi K Patel; Tosha Sheth; Palak Vaishnav
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-07-07

4.  Risk of uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labour with a history of both a caesarean section and a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Hinke de Lau; Hendrik Gremmels; Nico W Schuitemaker; Anneke Kwee
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Silent Spontaneous Uterine Rupture at 36 Weeks of Gestation.

Authors:  J Y Woo; L Tate; S Roth; A C Eke
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-19

6.  Effect of Entonox on reducing the need for Pethidine and the Relevant Fetal and Maternal Complications for Painless Labor.

Authors:  Alireza Sharifian Attar; Atefe Shirinzadeh Feizabadi; Lida Jarahi; Laya Shirinzadeh Feizabadi; Shima Sheybani
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-12-25

7.  Causes of an Increased Rate of Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Nenad Miseljic; Ejub Basic; Sanja Miseljic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2018-12

8.  Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Ying Feng; Huaxiang Shen; Jing Luo; Yueping Tao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean: Using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden.

Authors:  Charlotte Lindblad Wollmann; Kyle D Hart; Can Liu; Aaron B Caughey; Olof Stephansson; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Is there an optimal inter-delivery interval in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC)?

Authors:  Jiaming Rao; Dazhi Fan; Huiting Ma; Dongxin Lin; Huishan Zhang; Zixing Zhou; Pengsheng Li; Gengdong Chen; Demei Lu; Yan Liu; Zhaoxia Wu; Jieyun He; Xinjuan Liu; BingJie Peng; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.