Literature DB >> 16999607

Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution.

Michaella E Maloney1, Charles G Marguet, Yufeng Zhou, David E Kang, Jeffery C Sung, W Patrick Springhart, John Madden, Pei Zhong, Glenn M Preminger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) has become a first-line intervention for treatment of nephrolithiasis. However, few studies have examined the effects of modifications in the method of shockwave energy administration on comminution efficiency. We propose that a gradual increase in output voltage will produce superior stone fragmentation in comparison with a constant or a decreasing output voltage by optimizing the stress wave and cavitation erosion forces on renal calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BegoStone phantoms were implanted in the renal pelvis of 11 pigs that underwent SWL at a pulse repetition rate of 1 Hz. Animals in the increasing strategy group (N = 4) were subjected to 18, 20, and 22 kV for 600, 600, and 800 shocks, respectively. The second group (N = 4) received a decreasing strategy of 22, 20, and 18 kV for 800, 600, and 600 shocks, respectively. The third group (N = 3) received all 2000 shocks at 20 kV, mimicking the clinical protocol.
RESULTS: A progressively decreasing strategy and constant output voltage produced a mean comminution efficiency, or percentage of stone fragments <2 mm, of 89.0% +/- 3.3% and 87.6% +/- 1.7%, respectively. The mean comminution efficiency was improved to 96.5% +/- 1.4% by using the increasing strategy (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A progressive increase in lithotripter output voltage during SWL can produce greater stone fragmentation than protocols employing constant or decreasing output voltage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16999607      PMCID: PMC1931482          DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL.

Authors:  P Zhong; Y Zhou; S Zhu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  BegoStone--a new stone phantom for shock wave lithotripsy research.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Biological effects of shock waves: cell disruption, viability, and proliferation of L1210 cells exposed to shock waves in vitro.

Authors:  S Gambihler; M Delius; W Brendel
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Effects of SWL on glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in uninephrectomized minipigs.

Authors:  L R Willis; A P Evan; B A Connors; N S Fineberg; J E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Effects of tissue constraint on shock wave-induced bubble expansion in vivo.

Authors:  P Zhong; I Cioanta; S Zhu; F H Cocks; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-induced perirenal hematomas.

Authors:  P M Knapp; T B Kulb; J E Lingeman; D M Newman; J H Mertz; P G Mosbaugh; R E Steele
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Acoustic and mechanical properties of artificial stones in comparison to natural kidney stones.

Authors:  D Heimbach; R Munver; P Zhong; J Jacobs; A Hesse; S C Müller; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Fracture mechanics model of stone comminution in ESWL and implications for tissue damage.

Authors:  M Lokhandwalla; B Sturtevant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Morphological changes induced in the pig kidney by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: nephron injury.

Authors:  Youzhi Shao; Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; David A Lifshitz; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2003-11
View more
  16 in total

1.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Comparison of treatment outcomes according to output voltage during shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Hong-Wook Kim; Sungwoo Hong; Hee Jo Yang; Hong Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Editorial Comment on: The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms by Randad et al. (From: Randad A, Ahn J, Bailey MR, et al. J Endourol 2019;33:400-406; DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0516).

Authors:  Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Comparison of escalating, constant, and reduction energy output in ESWL for renal stones: multi-arm prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Danny M Rabah; Mohamed S Mabrouki; Karim H Farhat; Mohamed A Seida; Mostafa A Arafa; Riyadh F Talic
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Energy output modalities of shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary stones: escalating or fixed voltage? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zihao He; Tuo Deng; Shanfeng Yin; Zihao Xu; Haifeng Duan; Yeda Chen; Xiaolu Duan; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James A McAteer; Bret A Connors; Ziyue Liu; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  How effective is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones with Dornier Lithotripter S EMSE 220F-XXP? A prospective and preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Salvatore Micali; Stefano De Stefani; Giovanni Alberto Pini; Massimo Rivalta; Filippo Cianci; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Philip M Blomgren; Rajash K Handa; Lynn R Willis; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.