Literature DB >> 16998894

Comparison of multiplex PCR assays and conventional techniques for the diagnostic of respiratory virus infections in children admitted to hospital with an acute respiratory illness.

François Freymuth1, Astrid Vabret, Delphine Cuvillon-Nimal, Sandrine Simon, Julia Dina, Loïc Legrand, Stéphanie Gouarin, Joëlle Petitjean, Philippe Eckart, Jacques Brouard.   

Abstract

The performances of four multiplex PCR (m-PCR) were compared to direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and HuH7 cell culture for the detection of viruses in 263 children admitted to hospital with an acute respiratory illness. One hundred fifty (57.6%) nasal aspirates were found DFA-positive; 188 (72.3%) were found positive by both DFA and HuH7 cell culture, and 242 (92%) were PCR-positive. The m-PCR detected 124 viruses which were not found by conventional methods: 68 rhinovirus, 17 human metapneumovirus, 15 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), 8 parainfluenza virus (PIV), 5 coronavirus 229E, 3 OC43 and 3 NL63, 4 enterovirus, 2 influenza virus B and C virus. The m-PCR were more sensitive, had the advantages of a shorter delay in specific diagnosis, and a lower cost than DFA and culture. Using these m-PCR, the prevalence of each virus was compared between in-patient and out-patient groups of children attending the emergency unit of the hospital. Nasal aspirates from 411 (91.5%) children were found positive by the PCRs. RSV, rhinovirus, and influenza virus were the most frequent viruses detected in this population, representing 43.6%, 31.8%, and 8.8% of the virus found, respectively, followed by human metapneumovirus (4.4%), coronavirus (3.4%), parainfluenza virus (3.2%), adenovirus (2.3%), and enterovirus (2.1%). RSVs were detected more significantly in the in-patient group than in the out-patient group, and influenza viruses were detected more frequently in the out-patient group than in the in-patient group. Moreover, the use of m-PCR pointed out the frequency of rhinovirus and mixed viral detections in these patients. In conclusion, according to the requirements of speed and low cost of the methods, and to achieve the highest rate of detection of respiratory viruses, the combined use of DFA and m-PCR is today likely to be the best way to improve diagnosis of respiratory illnesses in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16998894      PMCID: PMC7159369          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.20725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  36 in total

1.  Simultaneous detection and identification of human parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, and 3 from clinical samples by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  J E Echevarría; D D Erdman; E M Swierkosz; B P Holloway; L J Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  [Viruses responsible for respiratory infections in pediatrics. Evaluation of 3,480 nasal aspirates performed in children over a 6-year period].

Authors:  F Freymuth; M Quibriac; J Petitjean; F Daon; M L Amiel
Journal:  Ann Pediatr (Paris)       Date:  1987-09

3.  Use of A-549 cells in a clinical virology laboratory.

Authors:  G L Woods; A Young
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the Prodesse Hexaplex multiplex PCR assay for direct detection of seven respiratory viruses in clinical specimens.

Authors:  M Hindiyeh; D R Hillyard; K C Carroll
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Diagnosis of respiratory tract viruses in 24 h by immunofluorescent staining of shell vial cultures containing Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells.

Authors:  S R Shih; K C Tsao; H C Ning; Y C Huang; T Y Lin
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.014

6.  Sensitivity of NCI-H292 human lung mucoepidermoid cells for respiratory and other human viruses.

Authors:  J C Hierholzer; E Castells; G G Banks; J A Bryan; C T McEwen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A sensitive, specific, and cost-effective multiplex reverse transcriptase-PCR assay for the detection of seven common respiratory viruses in respiratory samples.

Authors:  Melanie W Syrmis; David M Whiley; Marion Thomas; Ian M Mackay; Jeanette Williamson; David J Siebert; Michael D Nissen; Theo P Sloots
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Detection and identification of human parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3, and 4 in clinical samples of pediatric patients by multiplex reverse transcription-PCR.

Authors:  J C Aguilar; M P Pérez-Breña; M L García; N Cruz; D D Erdman; J E Echevarría
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Human picornavirus and coronavirus RNA in nasopharynx of children without concurrent respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  Johanna Nokso-Koivisto; Teemu J Kinnari; Päivi Lindahl; Tapani Hovi; Anne Pitkäranta
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Human metapneumovirus infection among children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness.

Authors:  James A Mullins; Dean D Erdman; Geoffrey A Weinberg; Kathryn Edwards; Caroline B Hall; Frances J Walker; Marika Iwane; Larry J Anderson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  90 in total

1.  Comparison of the Idaho Technology FilmArray system to real-time PCR for detection of respiratory pathogens in children.

Authors:  Virginia M Pierce; Michael Elkan; Marilyn Leet; Karin L McGowan; Richard L Hodinka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the one-step multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR ProFlu-1 assay for detection of influenza A and influenza B viruses and respiratory syncytial viruses in children.

Authors:  Jérôme Legoff; Rachid Kara; Florence Moulin; Ali Si-Mohamed; Anne Krivine; Laurent Bélec; Pierre Lebon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of two multiplex methods for detection of respiratory viruses: FilmArray RP and xTAG RVP.

Authors:  Kenneth H Rand; Howard Rampersaud; Herbert J Houck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical relevance of multiple respiratory virus detection in adult patients with acute respiratory illness.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Choi; Jin-Won Chung; Hye Ryoun Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Virological investigations in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI).

Authors:  M A Weber; J C Hartley; M T Ashworth; M Malone; N J Sebire
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Comparison of the GenMark Diagnostics eSensor respiratory viral panel to real-time PCR for detection of respiratory viruses in children.

Authors:  Virginia M Pierce; Richard L Hodinka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detecting respiratory viruses in asymptomatic children.

Authors:  Sonali Advani; Arnab Sengupta; Michael Forman; Alexandra Valsamakis; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 8.  Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods.

Authors:  James B Mahony
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Detection of multiple respiratory pathogens during primary respiratory infection: nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  T J Meerhoff; M L Houben; F E J Coenjaerts; J L L Kimpen; R W Hofland; F Schellevis; L J Bont
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Multiple viral respiratory pathogens in children with bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Hilary E Stempel; Emily T Martin; Jane Kuypers; Janet A Englund; Danielle M Zerr
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.