Literature DB >> 16988843

[Functional results after anatomically successful surgery for stage III/IV macular hole].

J Wrede1, C Engler, S Dithmar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the functional results after anatomically successful surgery for stage III/IV macular hole.
METHODS: Follow-up examinations (ETDRS charts, Birkhäuser near visual acuity charts, OCT) were carried out in 29 patients 11+/-5 months after surgery for stage III/IV macular hole (hole size >400 microm); in all cases the foveal contour had been restored postoperatively . The surgery performed also included cataract surgery (n=26), vitrectomy, ICG-assisted ILM peeling (in which perfluorcarbon liquid was used to prevent ICG from coming in contact with the retinal pigment epithelium) and tamponade with intraocular gas (n=16) or silicone oil (n=13). Silicone oil had been removed by the time of the follow-up evaluation.
RESULTS: Preoperative mean BCVA was 0.2 (0.64 logMAR+/-0.24) and postoperative BCVA, 0.5 (0.3 logMAR+/-0.19). None of the patients experienced any deterioration in sight; the average improvement in visual acuity was 3.5+/-2 lines. In 70% (n=20) of the patients the postoperative BCVA was > or =0.5. Visual acuity for near sight was 0.45+/-0.2. In 66% (n=19) a visual acuity of > or =0.4 was achieved for close work. The improvement in visual acuity was not related to the kind of endotamponade or to the size of the macular hole. Patients with macular hole diameters of 400-800 microm (n=20) gained 3.5+/-2.,4 lines, while in patients with macular hole diameters of 800-1135 microm the average gain was 3.6+/-1.3 lines.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomically successful macular hole stage III/IV surgery with ICG-assisted ILM peeling and protection of the retinal pigment epithelium from contact with ICG by perfluorcarbon liquid can yield good functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16988843     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1421-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  21 in total

1.  Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  S Ullrich; C Haritoglou; C Gass; M Schaumberger; M W Ulbig; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Macular configuration determined by optical coherence tomography after idiopathic macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  R Uemoto; S Yamamoto; T Aoki; I Tsukahara; T Yamamoto; S Takeuchi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Irregularity of photoreceptor layer after successful macular hole surgery prevents visual acuity improvement.

Authors:  Norihiko Kitaya; Taiichi Hikichi; Hiroyuki Kagokawa; Akira Takamiya; Atsushi Takahashi; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  [Anatomical and functional results after elective macular surgery].

Authors:  A Hager; S Ehrich; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography of surgically closed macular holes.

Authors:  Tony H Ko; Andre J Witkin; James G Fujimoto; Annie Chan; Adam H Rogers; Caroline R Baumal; Joel S Schuman; Wolfgang Drexler; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06

6.  Preoperative measurements of macular hole with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Correlation with functional outcome.

Authors:  E Byhr; B Lindblom
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1998-10

7.  [Prognostic factors in surgery of macular holes].

Authors:  U Mester; M Becker
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  C A Puliafito; M R Hee; C P Lin; E Reichel; J S Schuman; J S Duker; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Types of macular hole closure and their clinical implications.

Authors:  S W Kang; K Ahn; D-I Ham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Visual function and patient satisfaction after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  I A Pearce; M Branley; C Groenewald; J McGalliard; D Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Rate of reopening of macular holes following cataract operation].

Authors:  A Hager; S Ehrich; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.