Literature DB >> 16987782

Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures.

Geoffrey Underwood1, Tom Foulsham.   

Abstract

Models of low-level saliency predict that when we first look at a photograph our first few eye movements should be made towards visually conspicuous objects. Two experiments investigated this prediction by recording eye fixations while viewers inspected pictures of room interiors that contained objects with known saliency characteristics. Highly salient objects did attract fixations earlier than less conspicuous objects, but only in a task requiring general encoding of the whole picture. When participants were required to detect the presence of a small target, then the visual saliency of nontarget objects did not influence fixations. These results support modifications of the model that take the cognitive override of saliency into account by allowing task demands to reduce the saliency weights of task-irrelevant objects. The pictures sometimes contained incongruent objects that were taken from other rooms. These objects were used to test the hypothesis that previous reports of the early fixation of congruent objects have not been consistent because the effect depends upon the visual conspicuity of the incongruent object. There was an effect of incongruency in both experiments, with earlier fixation of objects that violated the gist of the scene, but the effect was only apparent for inconspicuous objects, which argues against the hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16987782     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500416342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  31 in total

1.  The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Hsueh-Cheng Wang; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing.

Authors:  Verena S Bonitz; Robert D Gordon
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-10

6.  Eye movements during scene viewing: evidence for mixed control of fixation durations.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Pierce L Graham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

7.  Eye-movement assessment of the time course in facial expression recognition: Neurophysiological implications.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production.

Authors:  Moreno I Coco; Frank Keller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-23

9.  Facial expression recognition in peripheral versus central vision: role of the eyes and the mouth.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Andrés Fernández-Martín; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-04-18

10.  Everyone knows what is interesting: salient locations which should be fixated.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Masciocchi; Stefan Mihalas; Derrick Parkhurst; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.