Literature DB >> 16987781

Attention to arrows: pointing to a new direction.

Jelena Ristic1, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

It was long believed that central arrows needed to be spatially predictive to produce a shift in spatial attention. Recent evidence indicates, however, that central spatially nonpredictive directional cues, like arrows, will trigger reflexive shifts in attention. We asked what this recent discovery means for past studies that used predictive directional cues such as arrows. Our findings indicate that predictive arrows produce attention effects that greatly exceed the individual or summed effects of reflexive orienting to nonpredictive arrows and volitional orienting to predictive numbers. This suggests that the especially large effect produced by predictive arrows reflects an interaction between reflexive and volitional orienting. Given the broad application of the predictive arrow cueing paradigm in both past and current research, the present data shed new light on a wide range of investigations, from psychophysical studies of basic attention to behavioural and neuroimaging studies of cognition and social development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16987781     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500416367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  33 in total

1.  Effective processing of masked eye gaze requires volitional control.

Authors:  Shahd Al-Janabi; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reflexive orienting by central arrows: evidence from the inattentional blindness task.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Dolev Avni; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

4.  Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Thomas J Ross; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one's will.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

6.  The number line effect reflects top-down control.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Alissa Wright; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

7.  Sex-Linked Mating Strategies Diverge with a Manipulation of Genital Salience.

Authors:  Adam K Fetterman; Nicole N Kruger; Michael D Robinson
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2015-02

8.  A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces.

Authors:  Jennifer D Bennett; Alejandro Lleras; Chris Oriet; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

9.  The uniqueness of social attention revisited: working memory load interferes with endogenous but not social orienting.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt; K Zoë Martin; Alison L Chasteen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.