Literature DB >> 16985893

Cavernous nerve stimulation and interposition grafting: a critical assessment and future perspectives.

John P Mulhall.   

Abstract

The sexual dysfunction that results from radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate is well established, with the degree of macroscopic preservation of the cavernous nerves tied to the degree of postoperative recovery of erectile function that is possible. In addition to the use of preoperative neuroprotective drugs and postoperative erectogenic agents, intraoperative nerve stimulation and grafting offer promise. Nerve stimulation may serve as a predictor of postoperative potency, and nerve grafting offers a potential way to correct the damage that occurs during wide resection. This article reviews the current literature on these intraoperative measures and discusses the need for additional studies of their potential benefits in prostatectomy candidates.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16985893      PMCID: PMC1477600     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  31 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in a UK-based population of men with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Roben Das Gupta
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Rationale for and results of nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  P T Scardino; E D Kim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  L Klotz; J Heaton; M Jewett; J Chin; N Fleshner; L Goldenberg; M Gleave
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Functional sequelae of cavernous nerve injury in the rat: is there model dependency.

Authors:  Michael Mullerad; John F Donohue; Philip S Li; Peter T Scardino; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  A positive caver map response poorly predicts recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H L Kim; D S Stoffel; D A Mhoon; C B Brendler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Immunophilin ligands promote penile neurogenesis and erection recovery after cavernous nerve injury.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett; Robyn E Becker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Neuroprotection and nerve grafts in the treatment of neurogenic erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Regeneration of nitric oxide synthase-containing nerves after cavernous nerve neurotomy in the rat.

Authors:  S Carrier; P Zvara; L Nunes; N W Kour; J Rehman; T F Lue
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neuroprotective and Nerve Regenerative Approaches for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction after Cavernous Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Campbell; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.