H L Kim1, D S Stoffel, D A Mhoon, C B Brendler. 1. Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preservation of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs), defined by a positive CaverMap response, correlates with the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We studied a group of 60 men who were potent preoperatively who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by one surgeon. The CaverMap was used after removal of the prostate to assess the integrity of the NVBs. Postoperative potency was assessed by a postal questionnaire and telephone interview, administered independently of the treating surgeon. Men were considered potent if they reported postoperative erections consistently sufficient for vaginal penetration with or without the use of sildenafil. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 59 years, and the median follow-up was 365 days. A positive CaverMap response was obtained in 73 (77%) of the 95 NVBs tested. The overall potency rate was 18%. No patients with a bilateral negative CaverMap response were potent, and 2 (22%) of 9 with a unilateral CaverMap response (negative versus unilateral response, P = 0.46) and 6 (27%) of 22 with bilateral CaverMap responses (negative versus bilateral response, P = 0.32) were potent. CONCLUSIONS: A positive CaverMap response, suggesting that a successful nerve-sparing prostatectomy had been performed, was obtained in 77% of the NVBs tested. Nevertheless, with a median follow-up of 12 months, most patients with a positive CaverMap response remained impotent. This suggests that other factors are critical to the recovery of sexual function after radical prostatectomy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preservation of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs), defined by a positive CaverMap response, correlates with the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We studied a group of 60 men who were potent preoperatively who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by one surgeon. The CaverMap was used after removal of the prostate to assess the integrity of the NVBs. Postoperative potency was assessed by a postal questionnaire and telephone interview, administered independently of the treating surgeon. Men were considered potent if they reported postoperative erections consistently sufficient for vaginal penetration with or without the use of sildenafil. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 59 years, and the median follow-up was 365 days. A positive CaverMap response was obtained in 73 (77%) of the 95 NVBs tested. The overall potency rate was 18%. No patients with a bilateral negative CaverMap response were potent, and 2 (22%) of 9 with a unilateral CaverMap response (negative versus unilateral response, P = 0.46) and 6 (27%) of 22 with bilateral CaverMap responses (negative versus bilateral response, P = 0.32) were potent. CONCLUSIONS: A positive CaverMap response, suggesting that a successful nerve-sparing prostatectomy had been performed, was obtained in 77% of the NVBs tested. Nevertheless, with a median follow-up of 12 months, most patients with a positive CaverMap response remained impotent. This suggests that other factors are critical to the recovery of sexual function after radical prostatectomy.