Literature DB >> 16985806

Radical perineal prostatectomy: a more optimal treatment approach than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients?

Albert C Leung, Arnold Melman.   

Abstract

In comparison with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), the perineal approach to radical prostatectomy offers specific technical advantages related to obesity and its unique surgical challenges. Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) reduces operative time and its associated risk of complication, which may be more pronounced in obese men. It allows for low blood loss, low postoperative use of narcotics for pain, short hospital stays, and requires only 1 small perineal incision. With a proven history of success, RPP presents obese men with an advantageous surgical option.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID： 16985806      PMCID： PMC1477559     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN： 1523-6161


  21 in total

1.  [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Alexandre de la Taille; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.915

2.  Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome.

Authors:  Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Laurent Salomon; Ran Katz; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Othmar Seemann; Michael Schulze; Dogu Teber; Martin Hatzinger; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  L D Sullivan; M J Weir; J F Kinahan; D L Taylor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002.

Authors:  Allison A Hedley; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Radical perineal prostatectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Judd Boczko; Arnold Melman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  P M Lassen; W S Kearse
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Critical surgical techniques for radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Arnold Melman; Judd Boczko; Johanna Figueroa; Albert C Leung
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Obesity in general elective surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Markus K Muller; Markus Weber; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?

Authors:  Howard J Korman; Patrick B Leu; Ray R Huang; Neal S Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450
View more
  5 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Mustafa Gürkan Yenice; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-04-03

2.  Recovery of urinary function after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical perineal prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Mohammad Jafri; Laura N Nguyen; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Rajeev Sood; Nikhil Khattar; Rishi Nayyar; Sachin Kathuria; Vineet Narang; Devashish Kaushal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10

5.  Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stanisław Wroński
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-09-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.