Literature DB >> 12463122

[Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].

Laurent Salomon1, Olivier Levrel, Alexandre de la Taille, Andras Hoznek, Dominique Chopin, Clément-Claude Abbou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the sites of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy according to the technique used: retropubic, perineal or laparoscopic.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 538 radical prostatectomies were performed between 1988 and 2001: 184 via a retropubic approach, 119 via a perineal approach and 235 by laparoscopy. Clinical examination, PSA assay (Hybritech, Normal < 4 ng/ml) and transrectal biopsies were performed in all patients. The radical prostatectomy specimen was examined by the same pathologist according to the Stanford protocol. The frequency and site of positive surgical margins were studied as a function of pathological stage.
RESULTS: The positive surgical margins rate was 32%, 18.5% and 26.4% for the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic techniques, respectively. The most frequent site of positive surgical margins was the apex for retropubic (41.1%) and perineal (41.6%) prostatectomy and the posterolateral part of the prostate for laparoscopic prostatectomy (41.9%). The most frequent site of positive surgical margins in pT2 tumours was the apex for the retropubic approach (50%), the base of the prostate (bladder neck) for the perineal approach (41.6%) and the apex and posterolateral part of the prostate for the laparoscopic approach (44.4% and 41.6%).
CONCLUSION: Each radical prostatectomy technique corresponds to a preferential site of positive surgical margins: the apex for the retropubic approach, the bladder neck for the perineal approach and the posterolateral part of the prostate for the laparoscopic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12463122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Urol        ISSN: 1166-7087            Impact factor:   0.915


  3 in total

1.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: a more optimal treatment approach than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients?

Authors:  Albert C Leung; Arnold Melman
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic positive margins: incidence, site, factors involved, and time to PSA progression following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Isabela C Watanabe; Matheus V Costa; Gilliat H Telles; Luis A Magna
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  [Outcomes of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer at the Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital].

Authors:  Ndiaga Seck Ndour; Yaya Sow; Babacar Sine; Modou Ndiaye; Alioune Sarr; Amath Thiam; Cyrille Zé Ondo; Ndèye Aissatou Bagayogo; Aboubacar Traoré; Samba Thiapato Faye; Abdoulaye Ndiath; Ousmane Sow; Boubacar Fall; Babacar Diao; Alain Khassim Ndoye
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.