Literature DB >> 16985703

The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life following treatment for localized prostate cancer.

D F Penson.   

Abstract

All forms of prostate cancer therapy carry significant risk of erectile dysfunction, but patients value sexual function so highly that they are often willing to choose a therapy that offers a shorter life expectancy but better potency following treatment. Advances in research methodology now allow reliable collection of meaningful data regarding patients' health-related quality of life, including both objective evaluation of patients' functional status and their perceptions of their own health and its impact on their existence. In the past decade, several validated and reliable questionnaires have been developed that are specifically designed to measure HRQOL in men with prostate cancer. Studies using these instruments have found that function and perceived bother may not be correlated; patients may express satisfaction with their therapy despite loss of sexual function. Erectile aids, including sildenafil, can be helpful for patients following treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 16985703      PMCID: PMC1557409     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  38 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life and sequelae in patients treated with brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Joly; D Brune; J E Couette; F Lesaunier; J F Héron; J Pény; M Henry-Amar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J A Talcott; P Rieker; J A Clark; K J Propert; J C Weeks; C J Beard; K I Wishnow; I Kaplan; K R Loughlin; J P Richie; P W Kantoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor.

Authors:  M S Litwin; S C Flanders; D J Pasta; M L Stoddard; D P Lubeck; J M Henning
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument.

Authors:  P Esper; F Mo; G Chodak; M Sinner; D Cella; K J Pienta
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  How is quality of life in prostate cancer patients influenced by modern treatment? The Wallenberg Symposium.

Authors:  J Altwein; P Ekman; M Barry; C Biermann; P Carlsson; S Fosså; G Kiebert; T Küchler; D McLeod; A Porter; G Steineck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The relationship of psychological distress, extent of disease, and performance status in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  D F Cella; B Orofiamma; J C Holland; P M Silberfarb; S Tross; M Feldstein; M Perry; L H Maurer; R Comis; E J Orav
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Self-assessed sexual function after pelvic irradiation for prostate carcinoma. Comparison with an age-matched control group.

Authors:  P Fransson; A Widmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993).

Authors:  F J Fowler; M J Barry; G Lu-Yao; A Roman; J Wasson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  8 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lauren M Walker; Richard J Wassersug; John W Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical care of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jason Izard; Andrea Hartzler; Daniel I Avery; Cheryl Shih; Bruce L Dalkin; John L Gore
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 6.  Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kuo-How Huang; Stacey C Carter; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Sexual function outcomes following interventions for prostate cancer: are contemporary reports on functional outcomes misleading?

Authors:  Catherine E Lovegrove; Vincenzo Ficarra; Francesco Montorsi; James N'Dow; Andrea Salonia; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.