Literature DB >> 28696184

Insurance Coverage for CT Colonography Screening: Impact on Overall Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates.

Maureen A Smith1, Jennifer M Weiss1, Aaron Potvien1, Jessica R Schumacher1, Ronald E Gangnon1, David H Kim1, Lauren A Weeth-Feinstein1, Perry J Pickhardt1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare overall colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates for patients who were eligible and due for CRC screening and who were with and without insurance coverage for computed tomographic (CT) colonography for CRC screening. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective cohort study, with a waiver of consent. This study used longitudinal electronic health record data from 2005 through 2010 for patients managed by one of the largest multispecialty physician groups in the United States. It included 33 177 patients under age 65 who were eligible and due for CRC screening and managed by the participating health system. Stratified Cox regression models provided propensity-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between CT colonography coverage and CRC screening. Results After adjustment, patients who had insurance coverage for CT colonography and were due for CRC screening had a 48% greater likelihood of being screened for CRC by any method compared with those without coverage who were due for CRC screening (HR, 1.48; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.55). Similarly, patients with CT colonography coverage had a greater likelihood of being screened with CT colonography (HR, 8.35; 95% CI: 7.11, 9.82) and with colonoscopy (HR, 1.38; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.45) but not with fecal occult blood test (HR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.10) than those without such insurance coverage. Conclusion Insurance coverage of CT colonography for CRC screening was associated with a greater likelihood of a patient being screened and a greater likelihood of being screened with a test that helps both to detect cancer and prevent cancer from developing (CT colonography or colonoscopy). © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28696184      PMCID: PMC5584666          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Taplin; Gigi Yuan; David Ransohoff; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans.

Authors:  James M Naessens; Mahmud Khan; Nilay D Shah; Amy Wagie; Rebecca A Pautz; Claudia R Campbell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Otto S Lin; Richard A Kozarek; Michael Gluck; Geoffrey C Jiranek; Johannes Koch; Kris V Kowdley; Shayan Irani; Matthew Nguyen; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor; David H Kim; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther M Stoop; Margriet C de Haan; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; C Yung Nio; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Maarten Thomeer; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Jaap Stoker; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann C DeBourcy; Scott Lichtenberger; Susanne Felton; Kiel T Butterfield; Dennis J Ahnen; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Gilda G Medina; Sarah T Hawley; Paul Haidet; Judith L Bettencourt; Navkiran K Shokar; Bruce S Ling; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; F Reed Johnson; Kathryn A Phillips; John K Marshall; Lehana Thabane; Nathalie A Kulin
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.

Authors:  Rosie G Scott; John T Edwards; Lin Fritschi; Noellene M Foster; Richard M Mendelson; Geoffrey M Forbes
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Public perceptions and preferences for CT colonography or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Samuel G Smith; Steve Halligan; Andrew Plumb; Darren Boone; Molly Sweeney Magee; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-06-16
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Judy Yee; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-03

2.  Efficacy of screening using annual fecal immunochemical test alone versus combined with one-time colonoscopy in reducing colorectal cancer mortality: the Akita Japan population-based colonoscopy screening trial (Akita pop-colon trial).

Authors:  Hiroshi Saito; Shin-Ei Kudo; Noriaki Takahashi; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Kenta Kodama; Koichi Nagata; Yuri Mizota; Fumio Ishida; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Colorectal cancer screening in the United States: Trends from 2008 to 2015 and variation by health insurance coverage.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Robin A Cohen; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Susan A Sabatino; K Robin Yabroff; Stacey Fedewa; Richard Lee; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cheryl Altice; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  [Colorectal cancer: role of imaging in screening].

Authors:  T Mang
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Influence of dental insurance coverage on access to preventive periodontal care in middle-aged and elderly populations: analysis of representative Korean Community Health Survey Data (2011-2015).

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Chun-Bae Kim; Nam-Hee Kim
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Value of multi-slice spiral computerized tomography for diagnosis of synchronous colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Zhonghua Gan; Shulan Liu; Mingxia Li; Guangyan Si; Qizhou He
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Factors Associated With Clinician Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Patients: Data From a National Survey.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Emily Weiser; Debra J Jacobson; Joan M Griffin; Paul J Limburg; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.830

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.