Literature DB >> 16982226

Continuation rates of Implanon in the UK: data from an observational study in a clinical setting.

Fatim Lakha1, Anna F Glasier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible methods of contraception can potentially reduce unintended pregnancy. There are few data on "real-life" continuation rates of the contraceptive implant Implanon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred twenty-four women choosing Implanon in a community family planning clinic in Scotland were followed up by case note review (n=236) or postal questionnaire (n=87) 3 years after insertion of the implant (1 woman chose not to disclose her home address).
RESULTS: Data were available for 85% of the women. Continuation rates were 89% (CI 84-91) at 6 months, 75% (CI 69-79) at 1 year, 59% (CI 52-63) at 2 years and 47% (CI 40-52) at 2 years and 9 months. Of the 68 women who discontinued Implanon within 1 year, 62 (91%) did so because of unwanted side effects, the most common being frequent and/or unpredictable bleeding (n=42, 62%). Almost half changed to a less-effective method of contraception; however, one third (n=99, 39%) chose to use a second implant when the first one expired.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuation rates of Implanon in this clinic setting in the UK make it a cost-effective method of contraception and justify its widespread provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982226     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.05.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Jessica R Rosenstock; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Zevidah Vickery; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Three-year continuation of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Justin T Diedrich; Qiuhong Zhao; Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Implanon): analysis of patient compliance and adverse effects in the breastfeeding period.

Authors:  Candan İltemir Duvan; Elif Gözdemir; Ikbal Kaygusuz; Zeynep Kamalak; Nilgün Öztürk Turhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant Insertion.

Authors:  Aileen M Gariepy; Jennifer Y Duffy; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Implanon: subdermal single rod contraceptive implant.

Authors:  Pushpa Bhatia; Sangita Nangia; Shivani Aggarwal; Chitra Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-09-28

8.  Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Priscilla de Nazaré Silva Dos Santos; Tessa Madden; Karen Omvig; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Factors associated with crisis pregnancies in Ireland: findings from three nationally representative sexual health surveys.

Authors:  Ashling Bourke; Caroline Kelleher; Daniel Boduszek; Karen Morgan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive.

Authors:  Heather Hohmann
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.