Literature DB >> 28041992

Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception.

Priscilla de Nazaré Silva Dos Santos1, Tessa Madden2, Karen Omvig3, Jeffrey F Peipert4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Users of hormonal long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) report weight gain as a side effect, but few studies have assessed body composition change among LARC users. We evaluated weight and body composition of healthy women using the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), copper intrauterine device (copper IUD) or etonogestrel implant (ENG implant). We hypothesized that weight gain and body composition over 12 months would not differ between copper IUD, LNG-IUS and ENG implant users. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study of a subgroup of women enrolled in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project who initiated the LNG-IUS, copper IUD or ENG implant. Inclusion criteria included lack of metabolic and eating disorders or change in body weight of more than 5% in the 6 months before enrollment. We measured changes in weight and body composition (body fat percentage, total body fat mass, total lean mass and total body mass) in women who continued their method for 12 months.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 149 participants: 85 LNG-IUS users, 31 copper IUD users and 33 ENG implant users. The mean age was 25.9 years, 56.4% were White, 82.5% had some college education and 67.6% were nulliparous. Although lean body mass increased over 12 months in LNG-IUS and copper IUD users but not in ENG implant users, changes in body weight and body composition did not differ between the groups. In the adjusted model, Black race was associated with change in total body mass (p<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Among those who continued the method for 12 months, changes in body weight and composition did not differ between copper IUD, LNG-IUS and ENG implant users. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Changes in body weight and composition over 12 months did not differ between copper IUD users and LNG-IUS and ENG implant users among those with 12 months of continuous use.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; Contraception; Copper intrauterine device; Etonogestrel subdermal implant; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Weight

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041992      PMCID: PMC5376505          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  24 in total

Review 1.  The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.

Authors:  Rebecca J Toombs; Gaele Ducher; John A Shepherd; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Body composition and bone mineral density in users of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant.

Authors:  Waleska Modesto; Natália Dal Ava; Ilza Monteiro; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Body weight and composition in users of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Natália Dal'Ava; Luis Bahamondes; M Valeria Bahamondes; Allan de Oliveira Santos; Ilza Monteiro
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Validity of perceived weight gain in women using long-acting reversible contraception and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  Ashley M Nault; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Construct validity of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire: flexible and rigid control subscales.

Authors:  E N Shearin; M J Russ; J W Hull; J F Clarkin; G P Smith
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 6.  Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  P D Blumenthal; A Voedisch; K Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Early weight gain predicting later weight gain among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users.

Authors:  Yen-Chi L Le; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition.

Authors:  M A Laskey
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.008

9.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  4 in total

1.  Weight change among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: Findings from a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial.

Authors:  Mags Beksinska; Rodal Issema; Ivana Beesham; Tharnija Lalbahadur; Katherine Thomas; Charles Morrison; G Justus Hofmeyr; Petrus S Steyn; Nelly Mugo; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Khatija Ahmed; Gonasagrie Nair; Jared M Baeten; Jenni Smit
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-04-06

2.  Contraception in chronic kidney disease: a best practice position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology.

Authors:  Rossella Attini; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Benedetta Montersino; Linda Gammaro; Giuseppe Gernone; Gabriella Moroni; Domenico Santoro; Donatella Spotti; Bianca Masturzo; Isabella Bianca Gazzani; Guido Menato; Valentina Donvito; Anna Maria Paoletti; Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Contraceptive Options Following Gestational Diabetes: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Ashley M Turner; Emily A Donelan; Jessica W Kiley
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2019-10-22

4.  Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Gormley; Brian Vickers; Brooke Cheng; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.