Literature DB >> 24509653

Impact of atypical hyperplasia at margins of breast-conserving surgery on the recurrence of breast cancer.

Shunrong Li1, Jieqiong Liu, Yaping Yang, Yunjie Zeng, Heran Deng, Haixia Jia, Qian Li, Huiyi Feng, Yangyang Li, Erwei Song, Qiang Liu, Fengxi Su.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Atypical hyperplasia (AH) is associated with a relatively higher risk of subsequent development of cancer. It remains controversial whether it is necessary to re-excise AH found at surgical margins during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of atypical ductal/lobular hyperplasia found at the margins during BCS on the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer patients.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis comparing patients with AH and receiving no further surgical treatment (n = 233) to those without AH at the margins during BCS (n = 158) was performed.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 76 months, the 5- and 8-year rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were 3.26 and 8.79% for women with AH and 2.56 and 8.95% for women without AH, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of IBTR (p = 0.803), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.749), or overall survival (OS) (p = 0.165). Moreover, no significant differences were found in IBTR, DMFS, or OS between patients with severe atypical hyperplasia (n = 86) and those without AH (n = 158) (p = 0.81, 0.82, and 0.78, respectively). Additionally, young women or those with ductal carcinoma in situ or triple-negative breast cancer with AH involving margins did not have a higher IBTR rate when compared to similar patients without AH.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that AH found at the margins during BCS does not increase the risk of subsequently developing an IBTR. There is not enough evidence for re-excision of AH found at the margins during BCS in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509653     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1597-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  22 in total

1.  Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  D L Page; L W Rogers
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Current management practice of breast borderline lesions--need for further research and guidelines.

Authors:  Eran Nizri; Schlomo Schneebaum; Joseph M Klausner; Tehillah S Menes
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The pathologic characteristics of breast cancer in China and its shift during 1999-2008: a national-wide multicenter cross-sectional image over 10 years.

Authors:  Shan Zheng; Jing-Qiao Bai; Jing Li; Jin-Hu Fan; Yi Pang; Qing-Kun Song; Rong Huang; Hong-Jian Yang; Feng Xu; Ning Lu; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Reena S Cecchini; Walter M Cronin; Andre Robidoux; Therese B Bevers; Maureen T Kavanah; James N Atkins; Richard G Margolese; Carolyn D Runowicz; Joan M James; Leslie G Ford; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Nomogram to predict ipsilateral breast relapse based on pathology review from the EORTC 22881-10882 boost versus no boost trial.

Authors:  Erik van Werkhoven; Guus Hart; Harm van Tinteren; Paula Elkhuizen; Laurence Collette; Philip Poortmans; Harry Bartelink
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Cancerization of lobules and atypical ductal hyperplasia adjacent to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; M Lacerna; F Vicini
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia at margin of breast biopsy--is re-excision indicated?

Authors:  Shalini Arora; Tehillah S Menes; Christine Moung; Chandandeep Nagi; Ira Bleiweiss; Shabnam Jaffer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Predicting cancer on excision of atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Erin Doren; Melissa Hulvat; Jonathan Norton; Prabha Rajan; Sharfi Sarker; Gerard Aranha; Katharine Yao
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Triple negative breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of residual invasive carcinoma after lumpectomy.

Authors:  Shirin Sioshansi; Shahrzad Ehdaivand; Christina Cramer; Michele M Lomme; Lori Lyn Price; David E Wazer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Janet Yeh; Jennifer Chun; Shira Schwartz; Annie Wang; Elizabeth Kern; Amber A Guth; Deborah Axelrod; Richard Shapiro; Freya Schnabel
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-08-17

2.  Quantitative nucleic features are effective for discrimination of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Masatoshi Yamada; Akira Saito; Yoichiro Yamamoto; Eric Cosatto; Atsushi Kurata; Toshitaka Nagao; Ayako Tateishi; Masahiko Kuroda
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-01-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.