Literature DB >> 16973776

How to optimize clinical breast MR imaging practices and techniques on Your 1.5-T system.

Dana R Rausch1, R Edward Hendrick.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, when used in conjunction with mammography and ultrasonography, can be a powerful tool for breast imaging. There are various clinical scenarios in which MR imaging may provide key information that leads to an alteration in treatment plans (eg, by demonstrating features that were occult at physical examination or conventional imaging). Although many benign and malignant entities enhance at contrast material-enhanced breast MR imaging, the morphologic characteristics and kinetic profiles of lesions help narrow the differential diagnosis. To optimize the quality of the morphologic and kinetic information yielded by breast MR imaging, the radiologist must attend to various practical and technical prerequisites: A bilateral breast coil should be used with prone positioning of the patient. An MR imaging system with a high-field-strength magnet is needed, and the magnetic field must be homogeneous across the field of view, which should include both breasts. A T2-weighted sequence should be applied first to identify any cysts and should be followed by three-dimensional imaging with a T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence after the intravenous administration of a gadolinium chelate. To minimize artifacts, a direction other than the anterior-posterior direction should be selected for phase encoding. To suppress the signal from fat, a frequency-selective pulse should be applied during imaging, or the unenhanced MR imaging data should be subtracted from the contrast-enhanced MR imaging data during postprocessing. The imaging section thickness should be 3 mm or less, the pixel size should be less than 1 mm in each in-plane direction, and the total acquisition time should be less than 2 minutes. Copyright RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16973776     DOI: 10.1148/rg.265055176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  10 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography for evaluating intraductal tumor extension of breast cancer.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  PET-MRI Findings of Two Patients with Breast Carcinoma before Treatment.

Authors:  Filiz Çelebi; Ülkühan Köksal; Kezban Nur Pilancı; Çetin Ordu; Dauren Sarsenov; Serkan İlgün; Fatmagül Kuşku Çabuk; Gül Alço; Güzide Özdil; Zeynep Erdoğan; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-04-01

3.  Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Laura Martincich; Veronica Deantoni; Ilaria Bertotto; Stefania Redana; Franziska Kubatzki; Ivana Sarotto; Valentina Rossi; Michele Liotti; Riccardo Ponzone; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge; Filippo Montemurro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Intravenous Line Phase-Wrap Artifact at Bilateral Axial 3-T Breast MRI: Identification, Analysis, and Solution.

Authors:  Einat Slonimsky; Yusef Azraq; John M Gomori; Susan Fisch; Tal Arazi Kleinman; Tamar Sella
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-11-06

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of fused positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance mammography: initial results.

Authors:  T A Heusner; S Hahn; C Jonkmanns; S Kuemmel; F Otterbach; M E Hamami; A R Stahl; A Bockisch; M Forsting; G Antoch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Effects of MRI scanner parameters on breast cancer radiomics.

Authors:  Ashirbani Saha; Xiaozhi Yu; Dushyant Sahoo; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.954

7.  Cylindrical Inversion Pulse for the Reduction of Cardiac Motion Artifacts in Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI.

Authors:  Masami Yoneyama; Masanobu Nakamura; Yuriko Ozawa; Makoto Obara; Tomoyuki Okuaki; Satoshi Tatsuno; Ryuji Sashi; Seishi Sawano; Marc Van Cauteren
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  Erdal Karavas; Bunyamin Ece; Sonay Aydın
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-28

9.  The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography.

Authors:  Eun-Ha Moon; Seok Tae Lim; Yeon-Hee Han; Young Jin Jeong; Yun-Hee Kang; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Replace Mammography and Ultrasonography for the Detection of Breast Lesions?

Authors:  Yeliz Yilmaz; Gulten Sezgin Bener; Kemal Atahan; Nihan Acar; Turan Acar; Haldun Kar; Furkan Tosun; Melek Gokova
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.