Literature DB >> 33778747

Intravenous Line Phase-Wrap Artifact at Bilateral Axial 3-T Breast MRI: Identification, Analysis, and Solution.

Einat Slonimsky1, Yusef Azraq1, John M Gomori1, Susan Fisch1, Tal Arazi Kleinman1, Tamar Sella1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To understand and remove the source of a phase-wrap artifact produced by residual contrast agent in the intravenous line during acquisition of bilateral axial 3-T dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI. Materials and
Methods: A two-part study involved a phantom experiment, followed by an institutional review board approved clinical intervention, to evaluate the phase-wrap artifact at MRI. A phantom model evaluated artifact production by using an intravenous line filled with fluids with varying concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agent (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, and 2 mmol/mL) and by positioning the simulated intravenous line within several fields of view (FOV) at 3-T MRI in breast coils. Next, a clinical assessment was performed with a total of 400 patients (control group:interventional group, 200:200) to determine the effect of taping the intravenous line to the patients' backs. Breast MR images were assessed blindly for the presence of the artifact. Software was used for statistical analysis with a P value of less than .05 considered a significant difference.
Results: In the phantom model, the artifact was produced only with a 0.4 mmol/mL gadolinium concentration and when the tubing was either close to the edge or within a FOV of 350-450 mm. In the clinical experiment, the artifact was more prevalent in the retrospective control group than in the prospective intervention group (52.5% [105 of 200] vs 22% [44 of 200]; P < .005).
Conclusion: The presence of phase-wrap artifacts can be reduced by moving the contrast agent intravenous line out of the FOV during acquisition by taping it to a patient's back during bilateral axial 3-T DCE breast MRI.Keywords: Breast, MR-Imaging, Phantom Studies© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33778747      PMCID: PMC7983766          DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020200004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer        ISSN: 2638-616X


  20 in total

1.  Breast MRI: State of the Art.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Nariya Cho; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Fat-suppression failure artifacts simulating pathology on frequency-selective fat-suppression MR images of the head and neck.

Authors:  Y Anzai; R B Lufkin; B A Jabour; W N Hanafee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine.

Authors:  K H Taber; R C Herrick; S W Weathers; A J Kumar; D F Schomer; L A Hayman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Impact of positional difference on the measurement of breast density using MRI.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Yi-Ting Tang; Jia Shen Hon; Po-Chuan Tseng; Angela T Cheriyan; Nikita Rakesh Shah; Dah-Cherng Yeh; San-Kan Lee; Wen-Pin Chen; Christine E McLaren; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Susan Weinstein; Mark Rosen
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Frequency-selective fat suppression MR imaging. Localized asymmetric failure of fat suppression mimicking orbital disease.

Authors:  A R Borges; R B Lufkin; A Y Huang; K Farahani; A C Arnold
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Bennani-Baiti; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  MR contrast agents: physical and pharmacologic basics.

Authors:  Shao-Pow Lin; Jeffrey J Brown
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Matthias Dietzel; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.