BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to examine the feasibility of implementing an ambulatory surveillance system for monitoring patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalizations. METHODS: This study consists of 1208 consecutive referrals to cardiac rehabilitation between October 2007 and April 2008. Patient attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, waiting times for cardiac rehabilitation, and adverse events while waiting for cardiac rehabilitation were tracked by telephone surveillance by a nurse. RESULTS: Among the 1208 consecutive patients referred, only 44.7% attended cardiac rehabilitation; 36.4% of referred patients were known not to have attended any cardiac rehabilitation, while an additional 18.9% of referred patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 456 referred patients who attended the cardiac rehabilitation program, 19 (4.2%) experienced an adverse event while in the queue (13 of which were for cardiovascular hospitalizations with no deaths), with mean waiting times of 20 days and 24 days among those without and with adverse events, respectively. Among the 440 referred patients who were known not to have attended any cardiac rehabilitation program, 114 (25.9%) had adverse clinical events while in the queue; 46 of these events required cardiac hospitalization and 8 patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory surveillance for cardiac rehabilitation referrals is feasible. The high adverse event rates in the queue, particularly among patients who are referred but who do not attend cardiac rehabilitation programs, underscores the importance of ambulatory referral surveillance systems for cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalizations.
BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to examine the feasibility of implementing an ambulatory surveillance system for monitoring patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalizations. METHODS: This study consists of 1208 consecutive referrals to cardiac rehabilitation between October 2007 and April 2008. Patient attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, waiting times for cardiac rehabilitation, and adverse events while waiting for cardiac rehabilitation were tracked by telephone surveillance by a nurse. RESULTS: Among the 1208 consecutive patients referred, only 44.7% attended cardiac rehabilitation; 36.4% of referred patients were known not to have attended any cardiac rehabilitation, while an additional 18.9% of referred patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 456 referred patients who attended the cardiac rehabilitation program, 19 (4.2%) experienced an adverse event while in the queue (13 of which were for cardiovascular hospitalizations with no deaths), with mean waiting times of 20 days and 24 days among those without and with adverse events, respectively. Among the 440 referred patients who were known not to have attended any cardiac rehabilitation program, 114 (25.9%) had adverse clinical events while in the queue; 46 of these events required cardiac hospitalization and 8 patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory surveillance for cardiac rehabilitation referrals is feasible. The high adverse event rates in the queue, particularly among patients who are referred but who do not attend cardiac rehabilitation programs, underscores the importance of ambulatory referral surveillance systems for cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalizations.
Authors: Adesuwa B Olomu; Mary Grzybowski; Vijay S Ramanath; Adam M Rogers; Bonnie Motyka Vautaw; Benrong Chen; Canopy Roychoudhury; Elizabeth A Jackson; Kim A Eagle Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Sherry L Grace; Yvonne W Leung; Robert Reid; Paul Oh; Gilbert Wu; David A Alter Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Elisa Candido; Janice A Richards; Paul Oh; Neville Suskin; Heather M Arthur; Terry Fair; David A Alter Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Karen Parker; James A Stone; Ross Arena; Debra Lundberg; Sandeep Aggarwal; David Goodhart; Mouhieddin Traboulsi Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 5.223