Literature DB >> 16970200

Self recognition versus recognition of others by biological motion: viewpoint-dependent effects.

Daniel Jokisch1, Irene Daum, Nikolaus F Troje.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of viewing angle on performance in recognising the identity of one's own person and familiar individuals such as friends or colleagues from walking patterns. Viewpoint-dependent recognition performance was tested in two groups of twelve persons who knew each other very well. Participants' motion data were acquired by recording their walking patterns in three-dimensional space with the use of a motion capture system. Size-normalised point-light displays of biological motion of these walking patterns, including one's own, were presented to the same group members on a computer screen in frontal view, half-profile view, and profile view. Observers were requested to assign the person's name to the individual gait pattern. No feedback was given. Whereas recognition performance of one's own walking patterns was viewpoint independent, recognition rate for other familiar individuals was better for frontal and half-profile view than for profile view. These findings are discussed in the context of the theory of common coding of motor and visual body representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16970200     DOI: 10.1068/p5540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  25 in total

1.  Visual information gleaned by observing grasping movement in allocentric and egocentric perspectives.

Authors:  Francesco Campanella; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; William F Thompson; John Sutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Self-recognition of avatar motion: how do I know it's me?

Authors:  Richard Cook; Alan Johnston; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Disrupted action perception in autism: behavioral evidence, neuroendophenotypes, and diagnostic utility.

Authors:  Martha D Kaiser; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  IQ predicts biological motion perception in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  M D Rutherford; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-04

6.  Evolution of the wave: aerodynamic and aposematic functions of butterfly wing motion.

Authors:  Robert B Srygley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Attentional orienting to own and others' hands.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Eduardo Madrid; Clara Aranda; María Ruz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Life is in motion (through a chick's eye).

Authors:  Bastien S Lemaire; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.899

9.  Healthy older observers cannot use biological-motion point-light information efficiently within 4 m of themselves.

Authors:  Isabelle Legault; Nikolaus F Troje; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-02-21

10.  Detecting deception in movement: the case of the side-step in rugby.

Authors:  Sébastien Brault; Benoit Bideau; Richard Kulpa; Cathy M Craig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.