Literature DB >> 16968183

Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and acceptable as a day case procedure?

Abdul Kasem1, Andrew Paix, Starlene Grandy-Smith, Shamsi El-Hasani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reviewed the results of performing day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure as a day case.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 150 day case laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between September 1999 and December 2004 under the care of the senior author. The results of a follow-up questionnaire to assess post-discharge clinical course and patient satisfaction were analyzed. All patients had commenced eating and drinking and were fully mobile before discharge home. The length of hospital stay was 4-8 hours.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 43 years; 134 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I, the remaining 16 patients were grade II. The mean operative time was 41 minutes. There were no conversions to open procedures. There was no bleeding, no visceral injury, and no mortality. There was one admission directly from the day surgical unit (admission rate of 0.6%), but no readmission following discharge. No patients were admitted due to postoperative nausea or pain. Ninety-nine (66%) of 150 patients responded to our questionnaire: 97% were satisfied about the information they had received. Patients rated their satisfaction with the procedure as follows: 75% excellent, 21% good, 3% satisfied, and 1 patient un-satisfied. Ninety-four percent of the patients would recommend the procedure as a day case.
CONCLUSION: Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, feasible, and cost-effective when patients are carefully selected. It provides good patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16968183     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost Effectiveness of a Fast-Track Protocol for Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies and Appendectomies.

Authors:  Colleen M Trevino; Karina M Katchko; Amy L Verhaalen; Marie L Bruce; Travis P Webb
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The clinical utility of pre-operative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Brian M Moloney; Ronan M Waldron; Niamh O' Halloran; Michael E Kelly; Eddie Myers; Joseph T Garvin; Michael J Kerin; Chris G Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Weiwei Chen; Qiang Wu; Ning Fu; Zhiming Yang; Jingcheng Hao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in a resource-limited setting: the first 49 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Yemen.

Authors:  Abdulzahra Hussain; Hind K Mahmood; Kiren Dulku
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  'True Day Case' Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Specialist Unit and Review of Factors Contributing to Unexpected Overnight Stay.

Authors:  A Solodkyy; A R Hakeem; N Oswald; F Di Franco; S Gergely; A M Harris
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-07-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.