Literature DB >> 26470696

Cost Effectiveness of a Fast-Track Protocol for Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies and Appendectomies.

Colleen M Trevino1, Karina M Katchko2, Amy L Verhaalen3, Marie L Bruce4, Travis P Webb5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fast-track protocols (FTPs) are used to decrease length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective outpatient procedures. Few institutions have implemented FTP for urgent procedures such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective single-institution cohort study including all patients undergoing urgent LC or LA between July 1, 2010 and May 1, 2013. Exclusion criteria included conversion to open procedure, perforated appendicitis, or procedure related to intra-abdominal injury. Analysis included a comparison of the three study groups: (1) before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of the fast-track protocol (FTP), (2) fast-track cohort (FT) and non-fast-track cohort (NFT), and (3) those completing the fast-track pathway (FT-C) and those who began but failed to complete the pathway (FT-F).
RESULTS: There were significant reductions in LOS between all study groups compared: between PRE (n = 256) and POST (n = 472) cohorts by half a day (2.0 vs. 1.5 days, p < 0.02); between FT and NFT (0.68 vs. 1.82 days, p < 0.01); and FT-C and FT-F (0.49 vs. 1.05 days, p < 0.01). Total hospital charges were significantly reduced in FT compared with NFT ($22,347 vs. $30,868, p < 0.01) with an average savings of $8521. Total hospital charges were decreased in the FT-C compared with FT-F cohorts ($21,971 vs. $22,939, p = 0.3) with an average savings of $968. Readmissions, complications, and satisfaction were similar for all comparison groups.
CONCLUSIONS: FTPs for urgent appendectomies and cholecystectomies can significantly reduce hospital costs by reducing LOS without compromising patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26470696     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3266-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  The importance of differentiating between elective and emergency postoperative critical care patients.

Authors:  Charles Weissman; Nava Klein
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Fast track surgery: a clinical audit.

Authors:  Jonathan Carter; Rebecca Szabo; Wee Wee Sim; Selvan Pather; Shannon Philp; Kath Nattress; Stephen Cotterell; Pinki Patel; Chris Dalrymple
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.100

4.  Does an acute care surgical model improve the management and outcome of acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Christopher W Lehane; Ravish N Jootun; Michael Bennett; Shing Wong; Phil Truskett
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Creation and implementation of an emergency general surgery registry modeled after the National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Robert D Becher; J Wayne Meredith; Michael C Chang; J Jason Hoth; H Randall Beard; Preston R Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  V L Wills; D R Hunt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith; M D Custer; J B Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Day case emergency laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  A D Gilliam; R Anand; L F Horgan; S E Attwood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and management of biliary tract stones in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Donald E Wenner; Paul Whitwam; David Turner; Amrita Chadha; Jason Degani
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ambulatory versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Trejo-Avila; Eduardo Cárdenas-Lailson; Carlos Valenzuela-Salazar; Jose Herrera-Esquivel; Mucio Moreno-Portillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis: efficacy, safety and feasibility. Multicenter randomized control study.

Authors:  Taras Nechay; Svetlana Titkova; Alexander Tyagunov; Mikhail Anurov; Alexander Sazhin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  Predictors of morbidity and mortality post emergency abdominal surgery: A national study.

Authors:  Afnan Altamimi; Mazen Hassanain; Thamer Nouh; Khawlah Ateeq; Murad Aljiffry; Abrar Nawawi; Ghaith Al Saied; Mohammed Riaz; Huda Alanbar; Abdullah Altamimi; Saeed Alsareii; Mashael Al-Mousa; Abeer Al-Shammari; Saleh Alnuqaydan; Amal Ghzwany
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

4.  Time is money: quantifying savings in outpatient appendectomy.

Authors:  Elise Taylor Bernard; Daniel L Davenport; Courtney M Collins; Bethany A Benton; Andrew C Bernard
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.