Literature DB >> 16966380

Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks.

Kristina Herzberg1, Vladimir I Bashkirov, Michael Rolfsmeier, Edwin Haghnazari, W Hayes McDonald, Scott Anderson, Elena V Bashkirova, John R Yates, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer.   

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoints coordinate the cellular response to genotoxic stress and arrest the cell cycle in response to DNA damage and replication fork stalling. Homologous recombination is a ubiquitous pathway for the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks and other checkpoint-inducing lesions. Moreover, homologous recombination is involved in postreplicative tolerance of DNA damage and the recovery of DNA replication after replication fork stalling. Here, we show that the phosphorylation on serines 2, 8, and 14 (S2,8,14) of the Rad55 protein is specifically required for survival as well as for normal growth under genome-wide genotoxic stress. Rad55 is a Rad51 paralog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and functions in the assembly of the Rad51 filament, a central intermediate in recombinational DNA repair. Phosphorylation-defective rad55-S2,8,14A mutants display a very slow traversal of S phase under DNA-damaging conditions, which is likely due to the slower recovery of stalled replication forks or the slower repair of replication-associated DNA damage. These results suggest that Rad55-S2,8,14 phosphorylation activates recombinational repair, allowing for faster recovery after genotoxic stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16966380      PMCID: PMC1636779          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01317-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  81 in total

1.  Rad54 protein is targeted to pairing loci by the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament.

Authors:  A V Mazin; C J Bornarth; J A Solinger; W D Heyer; S C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response.

Authors:  G S Brush; T J Kelly
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Yutaka Kanoh; Katsuyuki Tamai; Katsuhiko Shirahige
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of Rad55 protein as a sentinel for DNA damage checkpoint activation in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Vladimir I Bashkirov; Kristina Herzberg; Edwin Haghnazari; Alexey S Vlasenko; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity.

Authors:  G Liberi; I Chiolo; A Pellicioli; M Lopes; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; M Foiani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase.

Authors:  Boris Pfander; George-Lucian Moldovan; Meik Sacher; Carsten Hoege; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Roles of RAD6 epistasis group members in spontaneous polzeta-dependent translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Brenda K Minesinger; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways.

Authors:  W Xiao; B L Chow; S Broomfield; M Hanna
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p.

Authors:  Efterpi Papouli; Shuhua Chen; Adelina A Davies; Diana Huttner; Lumir Krejci; Patrick Sung; Helle D Ulrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Richard D Kolodner; Christopher D Putnam; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  41 in total

1.  Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3.

Authors:  Hocine W Mankouri; Hien-Ping Ngo; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Constance Alabert; Julien N Bianco; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Regulation of Elg1 activity by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Dganit Shkedy; Nishant Singh; Keren Shemesh; Ayelet Amir; Tamar Geiger; Batia Liefshitz; Yaniv Harari; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  RAD51 Gene Family Structure and Function.

Authors:  Braulio Bonilla; Sarah R Hengel; McKenzie K Grundy; Kara A Bernstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Lsm1 promotes genomic stability by controlling histone mRNA decay.

Authors:  Ana B Herrero; Sergio Moreno
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The Shu complex is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Julieta Martino; Kara A Bernstein
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  A role for checkpoint kinase-dependent Rad26 phosphorylation in transcription-coupled DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michael Taschner; Michelle Harreman; Yumin Teng; Hefin Gill; Roy Anindya; Sarah L Maslen; J Mark Skehel; Raymond Waters; Jesper Q Svejstrup
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Aflatoxin B(1)-Associated DNA Adducts Stall S Phase and Stimulate Rad51 foci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michael Fasullo; Yifan Chen; William Bortcosh; Minzeng Sun; Patricia A Egner
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-12-02

10.  A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ryan Janke; Kristina Herzberg; Michael Rolfsmeier; Jordan Mar; Vladimir I Bashkirov; Edwin Haghnazari; Greg Cantin; John R Yates; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.