OBJECTIVE: Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] is an effective treatment for osteoporosis administered by daily subcutaneous injection. The objective of this study was to determine how much benefit women expect teriparatide to confer before agreeing to perform daily injections. METHODS: We recruited postmenopausal women who had recently undergone bone densitometry and were found to have either a T-score less than -2.5 at the hip or spine and/or had a fracture index (FI) of > or =6. Participants completed an adaptive conjoint analysis questionnaire to determine their treatment preferences. RESULTS: The study sample included 185 women, mean age 71 (range 46-90). An increasing number of subjects preferred rhPTH (1-34) as the efficacy of teriparatide increased, but most women demanded efficacy advantages greater than those demonstrated in clinical studies. We found no association between absolute fracture risk and preference for rhPTH (1-34); however, subjects with an excessively high perceived risk of future fracture were more likely to accept daily subcutaneous injections compared to subjects with a lower perceived risk of future fracture (40% versus 15%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that most women demand benefits far greater than those conferred by rhPTH (1-34) in order to administer daily subcutaneous injections to decrease their future risk of fractures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Given the poor adherence for treatment of osteoporosis, and the choices older adults must make when paying for medications, development of novel treatment approaches should be based on older adults' treatment preferences.
OBJECTIVE:Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] is an effective treatment for osteoporosis administered by daily subcutaneous injection. The objective of this study was to determine how much benefit women expect teriparatide to confer before agreeing to perform daily injections. METHODS: We recruited postmenopausal women who had recently undergone bone densitometry and were found to have either a T-score less than -2.5 at the hip or spine and/or had a fracture index (FI) of > or =6. Participants completed an adaptive conjoint analysis questionnaire to determine their treatment preferences. RESULTS: The study sample included 185 women, mean age 71 (range 46-90). An increasing number of subjects preferred rhPTH (1-34) as the efficacy of teriparatide increased, but most women demanded efficacy advantages greater than those demonstrated in clinical studies. We found no association between absolute fracture risk and preference for rhPTH (1-34); however, subjects with an excessively high perceived risk of future fracture were more likely to accept daily subcutaneous injections compared to subjects with a lower perceived risk of future fracture (40% versus 15%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that most women demand benefits far greater than those conferred by rhPTH (1-34) in order to administer daily subcutaneous injections to decrease their future risk of fractures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Given the poor adherence for treatment of osteoporosis, and the choices older adults must make when paying for medications, development of novel treatment approaches should be based on older adults' treatment preferences.
Authors: Kathleen M Beusterien; Kristina Dziekan; Emuella Flood; Gale Harding; Jamie C Jordan Journal: Value Health Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Jerry Avorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Marilyn Arnold; Jennifer M Polinski; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-11-14
Authors: K E Ensrud; D M Black; L Palermo; D C Bauer; E Barrett-Connor; S A Quandt; D E Thompson; D B Karpf Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1997 Dec 8-22
Authors: D M Black; S R Cummings; D B Karpf; J A Cauley; D E Thompson; M C Nevitt; D C Bauer; H K Genant; W L Haskell; R Marcus; S M Ott; J C Torner; S A Quandt; T F Reiss; K E Ensrud Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-12-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Spoorenberg; A van Tubergen; R Landewé; M Dougados; S van der Linden; H Mielants; H van de Tempel; D van der Heijde Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; D E Thompson; W B Applegate; E Barrett-Connor; T A Musliner; L Palermo; R Prineas; S M Rubin; J C Scott; T Vogt; R Wallace; A J Yates; A Z LaCroix Journal: JAMA Date: 1998 Dec 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick Journal: Patient Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Robert A Bell; Debora A Paterniti; Rahman Azari; Paul R Duberstein; Ronald M Epstein; Aaron B Rochlen; Megan Dwight Johnson; Sharon E Orrange; Christina Slee; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-08-11
Authors: S Silverman; A Calderon; K Kaw; T B Childers; B A Stafford; W Brynildsen; A Focil; M Koenig; D T Gold Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Felicia Cosman; Nancy E Lane; Michael A Bolognese; Jose R Zanchetta; Pedro A Garcia-Hernandez; Karen Sees; James A Matriano; Kim Gaumer; Peter E Daddona Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 5.958