Literature DB >> 16965888

Patient willingness to take teriparatide.

Liana Fraenkel1, Barbara Gulanski, Dick Wittink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] is an effective treatment for osteoporosis administered by daily subcutaneous injection. The objective of this study was to determine how much benefit women expect teriparatide to confer before agreeing to perform daily injections.
METHODS: We recruited postmenopausal women who had recently undergone bone densitometry and were found to have either a T-score less than -2.5 at the hip or spine and/or had a fracture index (FI) of > or =6. Participants completed an adaptive conjoint analysis questionnaire to determine their treatment preferences.
RESULTS: The study sample included 185 women, mean age 71 (range 46-90). An increasing number of subjects preferred rhPTH (1-34) as the efficacy of teriparatide increased, but most women demanded efficacy advantages greater than those demonstrated in clinical studies. We found no association between absolute fracture risk and preference for rhPTH (1-34); however, subjects with an excessively high perceived risk of future fracture were more likely to accept daily subcutaneous injections compared to subjects with a lower perceived risk of future fracture (40% versus 15%, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that most women demand benefits far greater than those conferred by rhPTH (1-34) in order to administer daily subcutaneous injections to decrease their future risk of fractures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Given the poor adherence for treatment of osteoporosis, and the choices older adults must make when paying for medications, development of novel treatment approaches should be based on older adults' treatment preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16965888      PMCID: PMC1769517          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  35 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: an investigation of preferences.

Authors:  S Bryan; M Buxton; R Sheldon; A Grant
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Affect, risk, and decision making.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane; Donald G Macgregor
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment.

Authors:  Kathleen M Beusterien; Kristina Dziekan; Emuella Flood; Gale Harding; Jamie C Jordan
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Compliance with osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Jerry Avorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Marilyn Arnold; Jennifer M Polinski; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-11-14

5.  Women's preferences for prevention of bone loss.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Florina Constantinescu; Mayra Oberto-Medina; Dick R Wittink
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Treatment with alendronate prevents fractures in women at highest risk: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; D M Black; L Palermo; D C Bauer; E Barrett-Connor; S A Quandt; D E Thompson; D B Karpf
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997 Dec 8-22

7.  Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; D B Karpf; J A Cauley; D E Thompson; M C Nevitt; D C Bauer; H K Genant; W L Haskell; R Marcus; S M Ott; J C Torner; S A Quandt; T F Reiss; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Measuring disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: patient and physician have different perspectives.

Authors:  A Spoorenberg; A van Tubergen; R Landewé; M Dougados; S van der Linden; H Mielants; H van de Tempel; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Medical decision-making and the patient: understanding preference patterns for growth hormone therapy using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  J Singh; L Cuttler; M Shin; J B Silvers; D Neuhauser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; D E Thompson; W B Applegate; E Barrett-Connor; T A Musliner; L Palermo; R Prineas; S M Rubin; J C Scott; T Vogt; R Wallace; A J Yates; A Z LaCroix
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  16 in total

1.  Parathyroid hormone (1-34)-coated microneedle patch system: clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Peter E Daddona; James A Matriano; Jaap Mandema; Yuh-Fun Maa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Impact of bone turnover markers and/or educational information on persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy: a community setting-based trial.

Authors:  S L Silverman; K Nasser; S Nattrass; B Drinkwater
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Long-term stability and in vitro release of hPTH(1-34) from a multi-reservoir array.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Proos; James H Prescott; Mark A Staples
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development.

Authors:  Robert A Bell; Debora A Paterniti; Rahman Azari; Paul R Duberstein; Ronald M Epstein; Aaron B Rochlen; Megan Dwight Johnson; Sharon E Orrange; Christina Slee; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-08-11

Review 6.  Preventive Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Issues Regarding Patient Preferences.

Authors:  Axel Finckh; Monica Escher; Matthew H Liang; Nick Bansback
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Demonstrated solid-state stability of parathyroid hormone PTH(1-34) coated on a novel transdermal microprojection delivery system.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ameri; Peter E Daddona; Yuh-Fun Maa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  S Silverman; A Calderon; K Kaw; T B Childers; B A Stafford; W Brynildsen; A Focil; M Koenig; D T Gold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Teriparatide: a review of its use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stephanie K A Blick; Sohita Dhillon; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Effect of transdermal teriparatide administration on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Felicia Cosman; Nancy E Lane; Michael A Bolognese; Jose R Zanchetta; Pedro A Garcia-Hernandez; Karen Sees; James A Matriano; Kim Gaumer; Peter E Daddona
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.