CONTEXT: Treatment of osteoporosis with an anabolic agent, teriparatide [human PTH 1-34 (TPTD)], is effective in reducing incident fractures, but patient resistance to daily sc injections has limited its use. A novel transdermal patch, providing a rapid, pulse delivery of TPTD, may provide a desirable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel transdermal TPTD patch compared to placebo patch and sc TPTD 20-microg injection in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Our study consisted of 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, positive control, multidose daily administration. PATIENTS: We enrolled 165 postmenopausal women (mean age, 64 yr) with osteoporosis. INTERVENTIONS: A TPTD patch with a 20-, 30-, or 40-microg dose or a placebo patch was self-administered daily for 30-min wear time, or 20 microg of TPTD was injected daily. OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy measure was mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline at 6 months. RESULTS: TPTD delivered by transdermal patch significantly increased lumbar spine BMD vs. placebo patch in a dose-dependent manner at 6 months (P < 0.001). TPTD 40-microg patch increased total hip BMD compared to both placebo patch and TPTD injection (P < 0.05). Bone turnover markers (procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen) increased from baseline in a dose-dependent manner in all treatment groups and were all significantly different from placebo patch (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated, and no prolonged hypercalcemia was observed. CONCLUSION:Transdermal patch delivery of TPTD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis for 6 months is safe and effective in increasing lumbar spine and total hip BMD.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Treatment of osteoporosis with an anabolic agent, teriparatide [humanPTH 1-34 (TPTD)], is effective in reducing incident fractures, but patient resistance to daily sc injections has limited its use. A novel transdermal patch, providing a rapid, pulse delivery of TPTD, may provide a desirable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel transdermal TPTD patch compared to placebo patch and sc TPTD 20-microg injection in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Our study consisted of 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, positive control, multidose daily administration. PATIENTS: We enrolled 165 postmenopausal women (mean age, 64 yr) with osteoporosis. INTERVENTIONS: A TPTD patch with a 20-, 30-, or 40-microg dose or a placebo patch was self-administered daily for 30-min wear time, or 20 microg of TPTD was injected daily. OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy measure was mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline at 6 months. RESULTS:TPTD delivered by transdermal patch significantly increased lumbar spine BMD vs. placebo patch in a dose-dependent manner at 6 months (P < 0.001). TPTD 40-microg patch increased total hip BMD compared to both placebo patch and TPTD injection (P < 0.05). Bone turnover markers (procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen) increased from baseline in a dose-dependent manner in all treatment groups and were all significantly different from placebo patch (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated, and no prolonged hypercalcemia was observed. CONCLUSION: Transdermal patch delivery of TPTD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis for 6 months is safe and effective in increasing lumbar spine and total hip BMD.
Authors: Michel Cormier; Bonny Johnson; Mahmoud Ameri; Kofi Nyam; Luz Libiran; Dee Dee Zhang; Pete Daddona Journal: J Control Release Date: 2004-07-07 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Robert Lindsay; Felicia Cosman; Hua Zhou; Mathias P Bostrom; Victor W Shen; JoAnn D Cruz; Jeri W Nieves; David W Dempster Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-11-21 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Michael R McClung; Javier San Martin; Paul D Miller; Roberto Civitelli; Francisco Bandeira; Molly Omizo; David W Donley; Gail P Dalsky; Erik F Eriksen Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005 Aug 8-22
Authors: L J Fraher; R Avram; P H Watson; G N Hendy; J E Henderson; K L Chong; D Goltzman; P Morley; G E Willick; J F Whitfield; A B Hodsman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Monique Arlot; Pierre J Meunier; Georges Boivin; Lillian Haddock; Juan Tamayo; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Salomón Jasqui; David W Donley; Gail P Dalsky; Javier San Martin; Erik Fink Eriksen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-03-14 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: R M Neer; C D Arnaud; J R Zanchetta; R Prince; G A Gaich; J Y Reginster; A B Hodsman; E F Eriksen; S Ish-Shalom; H K Genant; O Wang; B H Mitlak Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Yebin Jiang; Jenny J Zhao; Bruce H Mitlak; Ouhong Wang; Harry K Genant; Erik F Eriksen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Javier O Morales; Kristin R Fathe; Ashlee Brunaugh; Silvia Ferrati; Song Li; Miguel Montenegro-Nicolini; Zeynab Mousavikhamene; Jason T McConville; Mark R Prausnitz; Hugh D C Smyth Journal: AAPS J Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 4.009