Literature DB >> 15940773

Women's preferences for prevention of bone loss.

Liana Fraenkel1, Florina Constantinescu, Mayra Oberto-Medina, Dick R Wittink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the serious consequences of osteoporosis, few women use pharmacologic measures to prevent postmenopausal bone loss. We used an interactive computerized questionnaire to examine women's preferences for prevention of osteoporosis.
METHODS: We administered a choice-based conjoint analysis survey (CBCA) to consecutive early postmenopausal women in a shopping center. The questionnaire was constructed to measure preferences for pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures to prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Women were also given the option of choosing "none," i.e., to defer or refuse all options. Utilities were calculated based on a Hierarchical Bayes model using Monte Carlo-Markov chain algorithms. We performed simulations based on women's values for specific treatment characteristics to estimate choice.
RESULTS: A total of 212 women agreed to complete the survey (42% participation rate). Between 18% and 47% of the women surveyed (mean age 52+/-5 yrs) were predicted to choose once-weekly medications to prevent postmenopausal bone loss, assuming treatment confers an absolute lifetime risk reduction in fractures of at least 10%.
CONCLUSION: In this CBCA survey, which derived preferences based on how women make tradeoffs between specific treatment characteristics, a significant percentage of women were willing to use once-weekly medications to prevent postmenopausal bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  8 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Patient willingness to take teriparatide.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Barbara Gulanski; Dick Wittink
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-09-11

4.  Conjoint Analysis at the Individual Patient Level: Issues to Consider as We Move from a Research to a Clinical Tool.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  S Silverman; A Calderon; K Kaw; T B Childers; B A Stafford; W Brynildsen; A Focil; M Koenig; D T Gold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  E W de Bekker-Grob; M L Essink-Bot; W J Meerding; H A P Pols; B W Koes; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Racial disparities in treatment preferences for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Florina Constantinescu; Suzanne Goucher; Arthur Weinstein; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Oral bisphosphonate compliance and persistence: a matter of choice?

Authors:  S L Silverman; J T Schousboe; D T Gold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.