Literature DB >> 16961996

Resolution of binocular rivalry: Perceptual misbinding of color.

Sang Wook Hong1, Steven K Shevell.   

Abstract

Is neural binding of color and form required for perception of a unified colored object? Individual cells selectively tuned to both color and orientation are proposed to moot the binding problem. This study reveals perceptual misbinding of color, thereby revealing separate neural representations of color and form followed by a subsequent binding process. Low luminance-contrast, rivalrous chromatic gratings were presented dichoptically. Each grating had alternating chromatic and gray stripes (e.g., red/gray in the left eye, green/gray in the right eye). Observers viewed the two rivalrous, 2 cpd gratings for 1 min. The duration of exclusive visibility was measured for four percepts: left-eye stimulus, right-eye stimulus, fusion of the two colors, or a two-color grating (e.g. a red/green grating). The percept of a two-color grating (misbinding) was observed with Michelson luminance contrast in the grating up to 20%. In general, for a given level of luminance contrast either misbinding (low luminance contrast) or color mixture (high luminance contrast) was observed, but not both of them. The perceived two-color gratings show that two rivalrous chromaticities are both represented neurally when color and form are combined to give a unified percept. "Resolution" of competing chromatic signals from the two eyes is not restricted to color dominance and color mixture. The transition from misbinding to color mixture by increasing luminance contrast shows that luminance edges have an important role in correct localization of color.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961996     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523806233145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  11 in total

1.  Masking within and across visual dimensions: psychophysical evidence for perceptual segregation of color and motion.

Authors:  Samuel W Cheadle; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Colour misbinding during motion rivalry.

Authors:  Ryan T Maloney; Sarah K Lam; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Contributions of magno- and parvocellular channels to conscious and non-conscious vision.

Authors:  Bruno G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Multistable binocular feature-integrated percepts are frozen by intermittent presentation.

Authors:  Para Kang; Steven Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Martin Golubitsky; Yukai Zhao; Yunjiao Wang; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Interocular suppression differentially affects achromatic and chromatic mechanisms.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Roles of contour and surface processing in microgenesis of object perception and visual consciousness.

Authors:  Bruno G Breitmeyer; Evelina Tapia
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-01

9.  Network symmetry and binocular rivalry experiments.

Authors:  Casey O Diekman; Martin Golubitsky
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 1.300

10.  Triggerfish uses chromaticity and lightness for object segregation.

Authors:  Laurie Mitchell; Karen L Cheney; Fabio Cortesi; N Justin Marshall; Misha Vorobyev
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.