Literature DB >> 16961991

Dark-adapted rod suppression of cone flicker detection: Evaluation of receptoral and postreceptoral interactions.

Dingcai Cao1, Andrew J Zele, Joel Pokorny.   

Abstract

Dark-adapted rods in the area surrounding a luminance-modulated field can suppress flicker detection. However, the characteristics of the interaction between rods and each of the cone types are unclear. To address this issue, the effect that dark-adapted rods have on specific classes of receptoral and postreceptoral signals was determined by measuring the critical fusion frequencies (CFF) for receptoral L-, M-, and S-cone and postreceptoral luminance ([L+M+S] and [L+M+S+Rod]) and chromatic ([L/(L+M)]) signals in the presence of different levels of surrounding rod activity. Stimuli were generated with a two-channel photostimulator that has four primaries for a central field and four primaries for the surround, allowing independent control of rod and cone excitation. Measurements were made either with adaptation to the stimulus field after dark adaptation or during a brief period following light adaptation. The results show that dark-adapted rods maximally suppressed the CFF by approximately 6 Hz for L-cone, M-cone, and luminance modulation. Dark-adapted rods, however, did not significantly alter the S-cone CFF. The [L/(L+M)] postreceptoral CFF was slightly suppressed at higher surround illuminances, that is, higher than surround luminances resulting in suppression for L-cone, M-cone, or luminance modulation. We conclude that rod-cone interactions in flicker detection occurred strongly in the magnocellular pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961991     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523806233376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  17 in total

1.  Threshold units: a correct metric for reaction time?

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Rod contributions to color perception: linear with rod contrast.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny; Vivianne C Smith; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Combination of rod and cone inputs in parasol ganglion cells of the magnocellular pathway.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Barry B Lee; Hao Sun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Persons with age-related maculopathy risk genotypes and clinically normal eyes have reduced mesopic vision.

Authors:  Beatrix Feigl; Dingcai Cao; Charles P Morris; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Lateral suppression of mesopic rod and cone flicker detection.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Yolanda H Lu
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Rod and S-cone driven ERG signals at high retinal illuminances.

Authors:  Jan Kremers; Dariusz Czop; Barbara Link
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Macular function in tilted disc syndrome.

Authors:  Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Influence of the rod photoresponse on light adaptation and circadian rhythmicity in the cone ERG.

Authors:  Morven A Cameron; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.