Literature DB >> 19101744

Rod and S-cone driven ERG signals at high retinal illuminances.

Jan Kremers1, Dariusz Czop, Barbara Link.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether L- and M-cone driven responses can be influenced by concomitant modulation in the rods or the S-cones. In addition, it was studied whether a change in the state of adaptation in L- or M-cones can have a different influence on ERG data when simultaneously the mean number of photoisomerizations in either rods or S-cones is altered. It was found that rods and/or S-cones cannot be neglected when measuring L- or M-cone driven ERGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19101744     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9159-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  25 in total

1.  L/M cone ratios in human trichromats assessed by psychophysics, electroretinography, and retinal densitometry.

Authors:  J Kremers; H P Scholl; H Knau; T T Berendschot; T Usui; L T Sharpe
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Cone-specific mediation of rod sensitivity in trichromatic observers.

Authors:  Arthur G Shapiro
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Brightness induction from rods.

Authors:  H Sun; J Pokorny; V C Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Graham E Holder; Mathias W Seeliger; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Dark-adapted rod suppression of cone flicker detection: Evaluation of receptoral and postreceptoral interactions.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Spatial and temporal chromatic contrast: Effects on chromatic discrimination for stimuli varying in L- and M-cone excitation.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Vivianne C Smith; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  L- and M-cone isolating ERGs: LED versus CRT stimulation.

Authors:  I J Murray; J Kremers; N R A Parry
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Response phase of the flicker electroretinogram (ERG) is influenced by cone excitation strength.

Authors:  T Usui; J Kremers; L T Sharpe; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Stimulation of rods can increase cone flicker ERGs in man.

Authors:  G B Arden; T E Frumkes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Rod-cone interaction in human scotopic vision--II. Cones influence rod increment thresholds.

Authors:  T E Frumkes; L A Temme
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to human pupil flicker responses.

Authors:  Pablo A Barrionuevo; Nathaniel Nicandro; J Jason McAnany; Andrew J Zele; Paul Gamlin; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Isolated mesopic rod and cone electroretinograms realized with a four-primary method.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny; Michael A Grassi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Dingcai Cao; Frederick T Collison; Gerald A Fishman; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Melanopsin photoreception differentially modulates rod-mediated and cone-mediated human temporal vision.

Authors:  Samir Uprety; Prakash Adhikari; Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Rod- and cone-driven responses in mice expressing human L-cone pigment.

Authors:  Tina I Tsai; Jenny Atorf; Maureen Neitz; Jay Neitz; Jan Kremers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-22

7.  Pupil responses to hidden photoreceptor-specific modulations in movies.

Authors:  Manuel Spitschan; Marina Gardasevic; Franck P Martial; Robert J Lucas; Annette E Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rod Electroretinograms Elicited by Silent Substitution Stimuli from the Light-Adapted Human Eye.

Authors:  John Maguire; Neil R A Parry; Jan Kremers; Deepika Kommanapalli; Ian J Murray; Declan J McKeefry
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.