Literature DB >> 16961988

The gap effect is exaggerated in parafovea.

Marina Danilova1, John Mollon.   

Abstract

In central vision, the discrimination of colors lying on a tritan line is improved if a small gap is introduced between the two stimulus fields. Boynton et al. (1977) called this a "positive gap effect." They found that the effect was weak or absent for discriminations based on the ratio of the signals of long-wave and middle-wave cones; and even for tritan stimuli, the gap effect was weakened when forced choice or brief durations were used. We here describe measurements of the gap effect in the parafovea. The stimuli were 1 deg of visual angle in width and were centered on an imaginary circle of radius 5 deg. They were brief (100 ms), and thresholds were measured with a spatial two-alternative forced choice. Under these conditions we find a clear gap effect, which is of similar magnitude for both the cardinal chromatic axes. It may be a chromatic analog of the crowding effect observed for parafoveal perception of form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961988      PMCID: PMC2648725          DOI: 10.1017/S0952523806233327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  32 in total

1.  The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype.

Authors:  A Stockman; L T Sharpe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Srividhya Hariharan; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Simple reaction times in color space: the influence of chromaticity, contrast, and cone opponency.

Authors:  Declan J McKeefry; Neil R A Parry; Ian J Murray
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Spatial summation of S-cone ON and OFF signals: effects of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  Angel Vassilev; Milena S Mihaylova; Kalina Racheva; Margarita Zlatkova; Roger S Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Comparison at a distance.

Authors:  Marina V Danilova; John D Mollon
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Is the S-opponent chromatic sub-system sluggish?

Authors:  H E Smithson; J D Mollon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Increment thresholds and the mechanisms of colour vision.

Authors:  W S STILES
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1949       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Influence of luminance contrast on hue discrimination.

Authors:  R L Hilz; G Huppmann; C R Cavonius
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1974-06

10.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Parafoveal color discrimination: a chromaticity locus of enhanced discrimination.

Authors:  Marina V Danilova; J D Mollon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Chromatic discrimination: differential contributions from two adapting fields.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Yolanda H Lu
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?

Authors:  M V Danilova; C Takahashi; J D Mollon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.