Literature DB >> 12714670

Simple reaction times in color space: the influence of chromaticity, contrast, and cone opponency.

Declan J McKeefry1, Neil R A Parry, Ian J Murray.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the influence of stimulus chromaticity on simple reaction times (RTs) to determine the stage of chromatic processing that is most influential in their generation.
METHODS: Simple RTs were measured in response to the cosinusoidally ramped onset of small, equiluminant, colored Gaussian spots. The chromaticity of these stimuli was varied, to modulate along a series of vectors in color space that included red-green (L-M) and blue-yellow (S-[L+M]) opponent axes.
RESULTS: RTs are highly sensitive to small departures from subjective equiluminance. They are also dependent on stimulus chromaticity. The longest RTs are generated in response to equiluminant stimuli that isolate S-cone activity, whereas the shortest are generated by stimuli that modulate the L-M opponent axis. However, temporal processing differences are highly dependent on how the chromatic stimuli are scaled in relation to one another. The differences are reduced when scaling is based on detection threshold. The relationship between chromatic contrast and RT can be described by the modified Piéron equation RT = RT(0) + k x C(-1).
CONCLUSIONS: Simple RTs generated in this study conform to the idea that they are largely determined by cone-opponency mechanisms. The use of cone contrast as a metric for scaling chromatic stimuli exaggerates differences between the temporal responsiveness of L-M and S-(L+M) opponency mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12714670     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  26 in total

1.  Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Stephanie Britton; Molly Spatcher; Stephan Hanowsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

3.  A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R H S Carpenter; A J Anderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Threshold units: a correct metric for reaction time?

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effect of stimuli that isolate S-cones on early saccades and the gap effect.

Authors:  A J Anderson; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Cortical activity is more stable when sensory stimuli are consciously perceived.

Authors:  Aaron Schurger; Ioannis Sarigiannidis; Lionel Naccache; Jacobo D Sitt; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Latency characteristics of the short-wavelength-sensitive cones and their associated pathways.

Authors:  R J Lee; J D Mollon; Q Zaidi; H E Smithson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  The Verriest Lecture: Short-wave-sensitive cone pathways across the life span.

Authors:  John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The spatial and temporal deployment of voluntary attention across the visual field.

Authors:  Guilhem Ibos; Jean-René Duhamel; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.