Literature DB >> 8295158

Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure?

R D Gibbons1, D C Clark, D J Kupfer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate empirical criticism of the psychometric properties of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) by undertaking an "internal construct validity" evaluation. Individual symptom responses for the HDRS were obtained from 370 patients meeting Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depression. A multidimensional normal item response theory (IRT) model was used to assess the dimensionality of the HDRS and estimate corresponding item parameters which were then expressed as factor loadings and item thresholds. The analysis yielded a five-dimensional solution. The first dimension (depressed mood, guilt, suicide, work and interests, agitation, psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, and loss of libido) appeared to define global depression severity. These results are consistent with other published factor analytic studies and provide further justification for thinking that the HDRS total score is a weak index of depressive syndrome severity. The findings provide a benchmark by which the adequacy of future results may be judged, because the multidimensional IRT model does not suffer from the statistical limitations that arise when applying traditional factor analytic methods to discrete symptom ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8295158     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(93)90037-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  45 in total

1.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  The factor structure of lifetime depressive spectrum in patients with unipolar depression.

Authors:  G B Cassano; A Benvenuti; M Miniati; S Calugi; M Mula; L Maggi; P Rucci; A Fagiolini; F Perris; E Frank
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 3.  Reliability and validity of depression assessment among persons with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Measuring the severity of depression and remission in primary care: validation of the HAMD-7 scale.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre; Jakub Z Konarski; Deborah A Mancini; Kari A Fulton; Sagar V Parikh; Sophie Grigoriadis; Larry A Grupp; David Bakish; Marie-Josee Filteau; Chris Gorman; Charles B Nemeroff; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Toward a very brief self-report to assess the core symptoms of depression (VQIDS-SR5 ).

Authors:  N De La Garza; A John Rush; B D Grannemann; M H Trivedi
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  A randomized controlled trial of venlafaxine XR for major depressive disorder after spinal cord injury: Methods and lessons learned.

Authors:  Charles H Bombardier; Jesse R Fann; Catherine S Wilson; Allen W Heinemann; J Scott Richards; Ann Marie Warren; Larry Brooks; Catherine A Warms; Nancy R Temkin; Denise G Tate
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Assessing full remission.

Authors:  Roger McIntyre; Sidney Kennedy; R Michael Bagby; David Bakish
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 8.  Item response theory facilitated cocalibrating cognitive tests and reduced bias in estimated rates of decline.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Laura E Gibbons; Dan M Mungas; Sebastien Haneuse; Eric B Larson; Lewis Kuller; Kathleen Hall; Gerald van Belle
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  The DSM-IV definition of severity of major depression: inter-relationship and validity.

Authors:  V Lux; S H Aggen; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Inter-rater reliability of Hamilton depression rating scale using video- recorded interviews - Focus on rater-blinding.

Authors:  M Krishna Prasad; K Udupa; K R Kishore; J Thirthalli; T N Sathyaprabha; B N Gangadhar
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.