BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) is a complex and time-consuming procedure, which is increasingly used for early gastric cancer (EGC). We provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in LAG. METHODS: Cumulative sum method was used to analyze outcomes of 109 patients undergoing LAG for EGC by one surgeon over a two year period; the influence of patient selection was evaluated. Target failure rate was set at 10%, with failure defined as open conversion, mortality, major morbidity, residual tumor, or inappropriate lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: There were 19 failures--fourteen performance and five oncologic. The learning curve, which displayed a slight rising trend and three phases was achieved after 40 cases with selected patients; it was broken, however, by the introduction of advanced procedures and unselected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced procedures and broad indications in LAG should be delayed until a learning curve is completed under the target failure rate.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) is a complex and time-consuming procedure, which is increasingly used for early gastric cancer (EGC). We provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in LAG. METHODS: Cumulative sum method was used to analyze outcomes of 109 patients undergoing LAG for EGC by one surgeon over a two year period; the influence of patient selection was evaluated. Target failure rate was set at 10%, with failure defined as open conversion, mortality, major morbidity, residual tumor, or inappropriate lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: There were 19 failures--fourteen performance and five oncologic. The learning curve, which displayed a slight rising trend and three phases was achieved after 40 cases with selected patients; it was broken, however, by the introduction of advanced procedures and unselected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced procedures and broad indications in LAG should be delayed until a learning curve is completed under the target failure rate.
Authors: K Maruyama; M Sasako; T Kinoshita; T Sano; H Katai; M Hada; A Schmidt-Matthiesen; O Dahl Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: H Yano; T Monden; M Kinuta; Y Nakano; T Tono; S Matsui; T Iwazawa; T Kanoh; S Katsushima Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2001 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Chang Hak Yoo; Hyung Ook Kim; Sang Il Hwang; Byung Ho Son; Jun Ho Shin; Hungdai Kim Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 4.584