Literature DB >> 30232158

Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.

Rosalind L Murray1,2,3, Jill Wheeler4, Darryl T Gwynne4,2, Luc F Bussière3.   

Abstract

Sex-specific ornaments typically occur in males, but they can also develop in females. While there are several models concerning the evolution of male-specific ornaments, it is not clear how, or under what circumstances, those models apply to female-specific ornament evolution. Here, we present a manipulative field experiment that explores the theoretical 'trait space' of multiple female-specific ornaments to study how these unusual traits evolved. We measured the attractiveness of two female-specific ornaments (pinnate leg scales and inflatable abdominal sacs) in the dance fly Rhamphomyia longicauda in a wild mating swarm. We found significant directional preferences for larger ornaments of both types; however, variation in one of the ornaments (abdominal sacs) was almost three times more effective at improving attractiveness. The abdominal ornament was consistently effective in increasing attractiveness to males regardless of leg ornament expression, while leg ornament size was only effective if abdominal ornaments were very small. These results are consistent with predictions from a sexual conflict model of ornament expression in supporting the probable role of deception in the evolution of female-specific ornaments among dance flies. Sexual conflict can be an important force in generating elaborate sex-specific ornaments in females as well as males.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  dance fly; female ornamentation; honest signalling; multiple ornaments; sexual conflict; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30232158      PMCID: PMC6170813          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

2.  Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish.

Authors:  T Amundsen; E Forsgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Extreme reversed sexual dichromatism in a bird without sex role reversal.

Authors:  Robert Heinsohn; Sarah Legge; John A Endler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Female finery is not for males.

Authors:  Natasha R LeBas
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Paul Doughty; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Contrasting sexual selection on males and females in a role-reversed swarming dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae).

Authors:  L F Bussière; D T Gwynne; R Brooks
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.

Authors:  E D Brodie; A J Moore; F J Janzen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  PERSPECTIVE: CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE.

Authors:  Brett Holland; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Sexual selection on female ornaments in the sex-role-reversed Gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli).

Authors:  S P Flanagan; J B Johnson; E Rose; A G Jones
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Courtship role reversal and deceptive signals in the long-tailed dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Lutz Fromhage; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Sex-specific aging in animals: Perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Anne M Bronikowski; Richard P Meisel; Peggy R Biga; James R Walters; Judith E Mank; Erica Larschan; Gerald S Wilkinson; Nicole Valenzuela; Ashley Mae Conard; João Pedro de Magalhães; Jingyue Ellie Duan; Amy E Elias; Tony Gamble; Rita M Graze; Kristin E Gribble; Jill A Kreiling; Nicole C Riddle
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 9.304

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.