Literature DB >> 16957881

The effect of coating single- and double-stranded DNA with the recombinase A protein of Escherichia coli on transgene integration in mice.

Jeffrey B Mason1, Jeffrey G Najarian, Gary B Anderson, James D Murray, Elizabeth A Maga.   

Abstract

Embryo survival and transgene integration rates are two major factors that influence the efficiency of transgenic animal production by pronuclear microinjection. Recombinase A protein-coated transgenes were compared for transgene integration and embryo survival with their non-coated counterparts in both single- and double-stranded forms. Murine zygotes were microinjected with a large 30 kb alpha(S1)-casein/human lysozyme DNA construct and a small 5.5 kb beta-lactoglobulin/desaturase DNA construct using four different construct preparations for each gene. The preparations included recombinase A protein-coated, single- and double-stranded DNA constructs and non-coated, single- and double-stranded DNA constructs. Using conventional non-coated, double-stranded DNA constructs, we obtained a transgene integration efficiency of 1.5% (1352 embryos transferred produced 20 transgenic pups). The same double-stranded DNA constructs coated with recombinase A protein yielded a similar percentage of transgene integration (1.1%, 18/1697). Using single-stranded DNA, non-coated constructs produced a transgene integration rate of 0.5%, while none of the 1040 zygotes injected with recombinase A-coated constructs produced transgenic pups. While recombinase A protein coating produced no effect on embryo survival, litter size or pregnancy rate with double-stranded constructs, a detrimental effect was observed on embryo survival (P < 0.001) and pregnancy rate (P < 0.005) with recombinase A protein coating of single-stranded human lysozyme DNA constructs. A trend toward increased embryo survival (P = 0.054) with no difference in pregnancy rate (P > 0.05) was observed with the recombinase A protein coating of single-stranded desaturase constructs. These results suggest that recombinase A protein coating of single- and double-stranded DNA constructs produced no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the efficiency of generating transgenic mice with respect to the percentage of transgenic animals born.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957881     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-006-9005-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  14 in total

Review 1.  New gene transfer methods.

Authors:  R J Wall
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest.

Authors:  L C Huang; K C Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic engineering of livestock.

Authors:  V G Pursel; C A Pinkert; K F Miller; D J Bolt; R G Campbell; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster; R E Hammer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Recombinase-mediated mouse transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Takehito Kaneko; Stefan Moisyadi; Ryota Suganuma; Barbara Hohn; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; Pawel Pelczar
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Evaluating Birth Frequencies and Embryonic Lethality in Transgenesis Following Pronuclear Injection of HIV DNA.

Authors:  P. Dickie
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.410

6.  Transgenic embryo yield is increased by a simple, inexpensive micropipet treatment.

Authors:  K Gundersen; T A Hanley; J P Merlie
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.993

7.  Double pronuclei injection of DNA into zygotes increases yields of transgenic mouse lines.

Authors:  S Kupriyanov; K Zeh; H Baribault
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Hot topic: using a stearoyl-CoA desaturase transgene to alter milk fatty acid composition.

Authors:  W A Reh; E A Maga; N M B Collette; A Moyer; J S Conrad-Brink; S J Taylor; E J DePeters; S Oppenheim; J D Rowe; R H BonDurant; G B Anderson; J D Murray
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Expression of human lysozyme mRNA in the mammary gland of transgenic mice.

Authors:  E A Maga; G B Anderson; M C Huang; J D Murray
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.788

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Exogenous enzymes upgrade transgenesis and genetic engineering of farm animals.

Authors:  Pablo Bosch; Diego O Forcato; Fabrisio E Alustiza; Ana P Alessio; Alejandro E Fili; María F Olmos Nicotra; Ana C Liaudat; Nancy Rodríguez; Thirumala R Talluri; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Use of single stranded targeting DNA or negative selection does not further increase the efficiency of a GGTA1 promoter trap.

Authors:  Benjamin P Beaton; Jiude Mao; Clifton N Murphy; Melissa S Samuel; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells
Journal:  J Mol Cloning Genet Recomb       Date:  2013-03-27

3.  Gene targeting in mouse embryos mediated by RecA and modified single-stranded oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Kang; Kwang Sung Ahn; Soon Young Heo; Ji Young Won; Hosup Shim
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.416

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.