Literature DB >> 16955046

Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: Part I--Technical development and a test case result.

Isador H Lieberman1, Daisuke Togawa, Mark M Kayanja, Mary K Reinhardt, Alon Friedlander, Nachshon Knoller, Edward C Benzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new miniature robot (SpineAssist; MAZOR Surgical Technologies, Caesarea, Israel) that has been developed and tested as a surgical assistant for accurate percutaneous placement of pedicle screws and translaminar facet screws.
METHODS: Virtual projections in three planes-axial, lateral, and anteroposterior-are reconstructed for each vertebra from a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan. On a specially designed graphic user interface with proprietary software, the surgeon plans the trajectory of the screws. Intraoperative fluoroscopic x-rays with targeting devices are then matched with the CT-based virtual images, as well as the surgeon's plan. A clamp is attached to the spinous process or a minimally invasive frame (Hover-T frame; MAZOR Surgical Technologies) is mounted to the iliac crest and one spinous process. The miniature robot is then attached to the clamp and/or frame. On the basis of combined CT scan and fluoroscopic data, the robot aligns itself to the desired entry point and trajectory, as dictated by the surgeon's preoperative plan.
RESULTS: A test case in a cadaver lumbar spine was performed in which four screws and two rods were inserted, using a minimally invasive technique, combining the SpineAssist system and Hover-T frame in conjunction with the PathFinder system (Spinal Concept Inc., Austin, TX). The discrepancy between the planned and actual screw trajectories was measured by means of postprocedural CT scan. Overall, the four screws were implanted with an average deviation of 1.02 +/- 0.56 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm) from the surgeon's plan.
CONCLUSION: These preliminary results confirm the system's accuracy and support its use in minimally invasive spine surgery applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16955046     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000229055.00829.5B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  37 in total

1.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  Tracked ultrasound snapshots in percutaneous pedicle screw placement navigation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Eric Moult; Joseph H Schwab; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Robotic-guided sacro-pelvic fixation using S2 alar-iliac screws: feasibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Weikai Chen; Zongyi Wang; Jun Lin; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.

Authors:  John A Buza; Jeffrey L Gum; Christopher R Good; Ronald A Lehman; John Pollina; Richard V Chua; Avery L Buchholz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-09-28

7.  Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shutao Gao; Zhengtao Lv; Huang Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: A systemic review.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Syed A Quadri; Mudassir Farooqui; Alessandra Cathel; Blake Berman; Jerry Noel; Javed Siddiqi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Robot-assisted Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Han Wang; Ya-Jun Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.