Literature DB >> 16953666

Calcium fluxes modulate the radiation-induced bystander responses in targeted glioma and fibroblast cells.

Chunlin Shao1, Fiona M Lyng, Melvyn Folkard, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

Bystander responses have been reported to be a major determinant of the response of cells to radiation exposure at low doses, including those of relevance to therapy. This study investigated the role of changes in calcium levels in bystander responses leading to chromosomal damage in nonirradiated T98G glioma cells and AG01522 fibroblasts that had been either exposed to conditioned medium from irradiated cells or co-cultured with a population where a fraction of cells were individually targeted through the nucleus or cytoplasm with a precise number of microbeam helium-3 particles. After the recipient cells were treated with conditioned medium from T98G or AG01522 cells that had been irradiated through either nucleus or cytoplasm, rapid calcium fluxes were monitored in the nonirradiated recipient cells. Their characteristics were dependent on the source of the conditioned medium but had no dependence on radiation dose. When recipient cells were co-cultured with an irradiated population of either T98G or AG01522 cells, micronuclei were induced in the nonirradiated cells, but this response was eliminated by treating the cells with calcicludine (CaC), a potent blocker of Ca(2+) channels. Moreover, both the calcium fluxes and the bystander effect were inhibited when the irradiated T98G cells were treated with aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and when the irradiated AG01522 cells were treated with DMSO, a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which indicates that NO and ROS were involved in the bystander responses generated from irradiated T98G and AG01522 cells, respectively. Our findings indicate that calcium signaling may be an early response in radiation-induced bystander effects leading to chromosome damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16953666     DOI: 10.1667/RR3600.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  27 in total

1.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  An evaluation of novel real-time technology as a tool for measurement of radiobiological and radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Mohammad Johari Ibahim; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Premila Paiva; Yuqing Yang; Marina Zaitseva; Peter A W Rogers
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Radiation-induced bystander effects in the Atlantic salmon (salmo salar L.) following mixed exposure to copper and aluminum combined with low-dose gamma radiation.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard W Smith; Lene Sørlie Heier; Hans-Christian Teien; Ole Christian Lind; Ole Christian Land; Colin B Seymour; Deborah Oughton; Brit Salbu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  The differential role of human macrophage in triggering secondary bystander effects after either gamma-ray or carbon beam irradiation.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Mingyuan He; Wenzhi Tu; Teruaki Konishi; Weili Liu; Yuexia Xie; Bingrong Dang; Wenjian Li; Yukio Uchihori; Tom K Hei; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 5.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 6.  Focus small to find big - the microbeam story.

Authors:  Jinhua Wu; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 7.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  New molecular targets in radiotherapy: DNA damage signalling and repair in targeted and non-targeted cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Radiation-induced bystander effects in cultured human stem cells.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Boris Vojnovic; Oleg Belyakov; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.