Literature DB >> 16952915

Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation.

A Raninen1, S Vanni, L Hyvärinen, R Näsänen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blindness of a visual half-field (hemianopia) is a common symptom after postchiasmatic cerebral lesions. Although hemianopia severely limits activities of daily life, current clinical practice comprises no training of visual functions in the blind hemifield.
OBJECTIVE: To find out whether flicker sensitivity in the blind hemifield can be improved with intensive training, and whether training with flicker stimulation can evoke changes in cortical responsiveness.
METHODS: Two men with homonymous hemianopia participated in the experiments. They trained with flicker stimuli at 30 degrees or with flickering letters at 10 degrees eccentricity twice a week for a year, and continued training with more peripheral stimuli thereafter. Neuromagnetic responses were registered at 1-2-month intervals, and the Goldmann perimetry was recorded before, during and after training.
RESULTS: Flicker sensitivity in the blind hemifield improved to the level of the intact hemifield within 30 degrees eccentricity in one participant and 20 degrees eccentricity in the other. Flickering letters were recognised equally at 10 degrees eccentricity in the blind and intact hemifields. Improvement spread from the stimulated horizontal meridian to the whole hemianopic field within 30 degrees. Before training, neuromagnetic recordings showed no signal above the noise level in the hemianopic side. During training, evoked fields emerged in both participants. No changes were found in the Goldmann perimetry. DISCUSSION: Results show that sensitivity to flicker could be fully restored in the stimulated region, that improvement in sensitivity spreads to the surrounding neuronal networks, and that, during training, accompanying changes occurred in the neuromagnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16952915      PMCID: PMC2117780          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.099366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  26 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search.

Authors:  R Näsänen; H Ojanpää; I Kojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Increment-threshold spectral sensitivity in blindsight. Evidence for colour opponency.

Authors:  P Stoerig; A Cowey
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays.

Authors:  D G Pelli; L Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual field enlargement by neuropsychological training of a hemianopsia patient.

Authors:  G J van der Wildt; D P Bergsma
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field defects.

Authors:  Dorothe A Poggel; Erich Kasten; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness.

Authors:  E Kasten; S Wüst; W Behrens-Baumann; B A Sabel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Conscious visual perception without V1.

Authors:  J L Barbur; J D Watson; R S Frackowiak; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Restitution of visual function in patients with cerebral blindness.

Authors:  J Zihl; D von Cramon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Repetitive visual stimulation: a neuropsychological approach to the treatment of cortical blindness.

Authors:  Walter Widdig; Burkhard Pleger; Oliver Rommel; Jean-Pierre Malin; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.138

10.  Visual field rehabilitation in the cortically blind?

Authors:  R Balliet; K M Blood; P Bach-y-Rita
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  27 in total

1.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Organization of area hV5/MT+ in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Amalia Papanikolaou; Georgios A Keliris; T Dorina Papageorgiou; Ulrich Schiefer; Nikos K Logothetis; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Altered Sensitivity to Motion of Area MT Neurons Following Long-Term V1 Lesions.

Authors:  Maureen A Hagan; Tristan A Chaplin; Krystel R Huxlin; Marcello G P Rosa; Leo L Lui
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Beyond blindsight: properties of visual relearning in cortically blind fields.

Authors:  Anasuya Das; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional preservation and enhanced capacity for visual restoration in subacute occipital stroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Saionz; Duje Tadin; Michael D Melnick; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Feature-based attention potentiates recovery of fine direction discrimination in cortically blind patients.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness.

Authors:  Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.519

8.  Compensatory strategies following visual search training in patients with homonymous hemianopia: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Sabira K Mannan; Alidz L M Pambakian; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Implications of deafblindness on visual assessment procedures: considerations for audiologists, ophthalmologists, and interpreters.

Authors:  Lea Hyvärinen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

10.  Rehabilitation of damage to the visual brain.

Authors:  S Ajina; C Kennard
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.607

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.