Literature DB >> 9734406

Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness.

E Kasten1, S Wüst, W Behrens-Baumann, B A Sabel.   

Abstract

Partial blindness after brain injury has been considered non-treatable. To evaluate whether patients with visual-field defects can profit from computer-based visual restitution training (VRT), two independent clinical trials were conducted using patients with optic nerve (n = 19) or post-chiasmatic brain injury (n = 19). In post-chiasma patients, VRT led to a significant improvement (29.4%) over baseline in the ability to detect visual stimuli; in optic nerve patients, the effects were even more pronounced (73.6% improvement). Visual-field enlargements were confirmed by the observation of a visual-field expansion of 4.9 degrees-5.8 degrees of visual angle and improved acuity in optic nerve patients. Ninety five percent of the VRT-treated patients showed improvements, 72.2% confirmed visual improvements subjectively. Patients receiving a placebo training did not show comparable improvements. In conclusion, VRT with a computer program improves vision in patients with visual-field defects and offers a new, cost-effective therapy for partial blindness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9734406     DOI: 10.1038/2079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  71 in total

1.  Plasticity of orientation preference maps in the visual cortex of adult cats.

Authors:  Ben Godde; Ralph Leonhardt; Sven M Cords; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Eye-movement training-induced changes of visual field representation in patients with post-stroke hemianopia.

Authors:  Gereon Nelles; Anja Pscherer; Armin de Greiff; Horst Gerhard; Michael Forsting; Joachim Esser; H Christoph Diener
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Improved detection following Neuro-Eye Therapy in patients with post-geniculate brain damage.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Mary-Joan Macleod; Ceri T Trevethan; Siân E Robson; John A Olson; Paula Callaghan; Brigitte Yip
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Disappointing results from Nova Vision's visual restoration therapy.

Authors:  J C Horton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Vision restoration therapy.

Authors:  B A Sabel; S Kenkel; E Kasten
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Vision restoration therapy: confounded by eye movements.

Authors:  J C Horton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Vision restoration therapy and raising red flags too early.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study.

Authors:  J Reinhard; A Schreiber; U Schiefer; E Kasten; B A Sabel; S Kenkel; R Vonthein; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Temporally coherent visual stimuli boost ocular dominance plasticity.

Authors:  Ulrike Matthies; Jenny Balog; Konrad Lehmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.