Athip Nilkaeo1, Suthinee Bhuvanath. 1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla 90112, Thailand.
Abstract
Interleukin-18 (IL-18), a proinflammatory cytokine, is produced by oral epithelia and carcinoma cells and implicated in tumor regression. Since its direct biological effect on oral cancer cells is not well defined, in this study, we employed a KB cell line to test IL-18 activity. Recombinant human IL-18 significantly inhibited KB cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion (P < .05) without increasing cytotoxicity. Analysis of its mode of action showed that IL-18 induced cell cycle arrest in the S phase; however, it did not trigger apoptotic cell death. Findings in this study indicate that the suppression of KB cell proliferation was attributed to the modulation of cell cycle progression, providing a new role of this cytokine in antitumor mechanisms.
Interleukin-18 (IL-18), a proinflammatory cytokine, is produced by oral epithelia and carcinoma cells and implicated in tumor regression. Since its direct biological effect on oral cancer cells is not well defined, in this study, we employed a KB cell line to test IL-18 activity. Recombinant humanIL-18 significantly inhibited KB cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion (P < .05) without increasing cytotoxicity. Analysis of its mode of action showed that IL-18 induced cell cycle arrest in the S phase; however, it did not trigger apoptotic cell death. Findings in this study indicate that the suppression of KB cell proliferation was attributed to the modulation of cell cycle progression, providing a new role of this cytokine in antitumor mechanisms.
Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a pleiotropic inflammatory cytokine
produced by both immune and nonimmune cells. It shares several properties with
a proinflammatory cytokine IL-1, and is therefore categorized as a
member of the IL-1 family. This cytokine was first discovered as a
potent IFN-γ-inducing factor in the serum and livers of
mice exposed to Propionibacterium acnes and LPS
[1].
The known activators of IL-18 production are LPS, IL-1, IL-6,
TNF-α, and interferons. IL-18 is initially produced as
pro-IL-18 (24 kDa) which is then processed by caspase-1 and
other caspases to a mature form with a molecular weight of
18 kDa [2]. IL-18 exerts its biological effect via its
receptor complex. IL-18 receptor (IL-18R) is comprised of
IL-18Rα which is identical to the IL-1R-related protein
(IL-1Rrp) and a signal transducing subunit IL-18Rβ. The binding of IL-18 to its receptor results in recruitment of adaptor
proteins such as MyD88, IRAK, and TRAF6 and leads to the increased
activation of transcription factor NF-κB [3,
4]. It also activates AP-1, MAPK, STAT3,
and the stress kinase p38 pathways [5].IL-18 modulates both innate and specific immune responses
[6]. IL-18 and IL-12 act synergistically to induce
IFN-γ production by T cells, and it can synergize with
IL-10 to induce IFN-γ production by NK cells [7,
8].
In addition, IL-18 is involved in inflammatory responses of some
autoimmunity conditions including arthritis and systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE) [9,
10]. It is also expressed at the
maternal-fetal interface and function to enhance decidual
lymphocyte cytotoxic activity [11].
With its primary function
in activation of NK cells and induction of IFN-γ production by T cells, several recent studies have shown that
IL-18 is a potential player in modulating the immune system to
destroy cancer cells [12].In humanoral carcinoma, patients often display high antibody
functions and high levels of Th2 cytokines from an advanced-stage
tumor [13]. IL-18 is produced
by oral epithelia and carcinoma
and this cytokine may function to enhance IFN-γ production
by NK cells [14]. Furthermore,
sera levels of IL-18 as well as other Th1 cytokines are upregulated in nude mice bearing
salivary adenocarcinoma treated with streptococcal product and
this results in a significant reduction of tumor growth [15].
In addition, it was demonstrated that polymorphonuclear leukocyte
production of IL-18 was enhanced in oral cavity cancerpatients
after cancer treatment [16].
These data indicate that IL-18
is an antineoplastic cytokine. However, an antitumor property of
IL-18 on oral carcinoma has not been directly shown. In this
study, we have chosen the KB oral carcinoma cell line, as an
example of oral carcinoma, to study the effect of IL-18.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cytokines and cell line
Recombinant humanIL-18, IL-1β, and TNF-α were
purchased from Peprotech Inc (Rocky Hill, NJ). The KB cell line
is a carcinoma cell line derived from the oral cavity and was
kindly provided by Dr Sithichai Khuntongkaew, Faculty of
Dentistry, Thammasat University, Thailand. The cells display
epithelial morphology. The cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md) with 10% FBS (Biochrom AG
Seromed, Berlin, Germany) and antibiotics (100 unit/mL of
penicillin G and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin sulfate) and
cultured at 37°C in 5% CO.
Expression of IL-18R and apoptotic genes
The expression of IL-18 receptors and apoptotic genes in KB cells
was investigated using RT-PCR. Cells were cultured in complete
DMEM-F12 medium with or without cytokine treatment. The total RNA
was isolated from KB cells by using an acid-guanidium thiocyanatephenol/chloroform extraction protocol [17],
and examined for purity using 1% denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis, and
then subjected to one-step RT-PCR (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for
the expression of genes that paralleled the G3PDH house keeping
gene. The following specific oligonucleotide primers were used:
IL-18Rα upstream (5′ GTTGAGTTGAATGACACAGG 3′) and
IL-18Rα downstream (5′ TCCACTGCAACATGGTTAAG 3′)
generating a 420-bp PCR product; IL-18Rβ upstream (5′ TGCTCCTGTACATCCTGCTTG 3′)
and IL-18Rβ downstream (5′ TCTGCTCAGCAACATCTCTAT 3′)
generating a 783-bp PCR product; G3PDH upstream (5′
TGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT 3′) and G3PDH
downstream (5′ CATGTGGGCATGAGGTCCACCAC 3′)
generating a 983-bp PCR product; bax upstream (5′
GGCCCACCAGCTCTGAGCAGA 3′) and
bax downstream (5′ GCCACGTGGGCGTCCCAAAGT 3′) generating a
479-bp PCR product; bcl-2 upstream (5′ GTGGAGGAGCTCTTCAGGGA
3′) and bcl-2 downstream (5′ AGGCACCCAGGGTGATGCAA 3′)
generating a 304-bp PCR product. Amplification of cDNA was
performed for 32 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 58°C
for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s for IL-18Rα and IL-18Rβ; 35 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 60°C
for 45 s, and 72°C for 2 min for G3PDH; 35 cycles
at 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 30 s, and
72°C for 30 s for bax; and at 94°C for 30 s,
60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s for bcl-2.
PCR products were examined by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis
in 0.5X Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer, and visualized by ethidium
bromide staining.
MTT proliferation assay and lactate dehydrogenase assay
Briefly, KB cells (10 000 cells/well) were cultured in collagen I
(50 μg/mL) coated 96-well culture plates, in a total
volume of 200 μL DMEM-F12 supplemented with 1% FBS.
Cells were cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations
of recombinant humanIL-18 (0–100 ng/mL). Both treatment and
control groups were performed in 6–8 replicate wells. The
relative number of viable cells was then determined at 72 hours
after incubation, by adding 1 mg/mL of
3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide
(MTT) and incubating the cell further for 4 hours. The formazan
crystals formed were then solubilized with acid isopropanol for 1
hour. The absorption value of the solution at 595 nm directly
represents relative cell numbers. The cell decrease percent relative to
the control group was then determined.Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released from the cells was used to detect
cytotoxicity and was measured at the end of each proliferation experiment. Briefly,
culture plates were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 15 minutes at
room temperature to ensure accumulation of cells at the bottom of
the wells. Cell-free culture media (100 μL) was collected
and then incubated with 100 μL of the reaction mixture of
the cytotoxicity detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis,
Ind) for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. 1 N
HCl (50 μL) was added into each well to stop the
enzymatic reaction. The optical density of the solution was then
measured by using an ELISA plate reader with a 490 nm filter.
Cytotoxicity percent to the control was then determined.
Cell death assays
For the in situ apoptotic cell death detection assay, KB cells
were cultured on a glass slide in 6-well plate until 70–80%
confluence had been achieved. The culture medium was replaced with
fresh medium containing 1% FBS with or without IL-18
(100 ng/mL) and incubated for 72 hours. Apoptotic cell death
was detected using an apoptosis staining kit (R&D systems,
Minneapolis, Minn) in the culture plate and visualized using laser
confocal microscopy. Similar experiments were conducted without
glass slides and apoptotic cells were determined using flow
cytometry.In DNA laddering analysis, KB cells were cultured in 6-well
culture plate until 70–80% confluence. The medium was replaced
with fresh medium supplemented with 1% FBS in the presence of
IL-18 (0–100 ng/mL) and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Cells were then washed with cold PBS and lysis solution was added.
DNA samples were then extracted from the solution using a
phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction protocol. DNA
concentration was determined using a spectrophotometer
(OD260). DNA (1 μg) samples were then fractionated
by agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoresis. The gel was then stained
with ethidium bromide and visualized using a UV transilluminator,
and photographs were taken using a gel documentation system.
Cell cycle analysis
KB cells (350 000 cells/well) were grown in 6-well culture plate
and synchronized using serum starvation and hydroxyurea
(0.1 mM) treatment for 24 hours. Synchronized KB cells were
restimulated with medium containing 2% FBS or 2% FBS plus
IL-18 (100 ng/mL) and incubated for various times (0, 8, 24,
32, and 48 hours). Cells were then trypsinized, centrifuged, and
resuspended in PBS. Cells were then fixed, stained with propidium
iodide solution, and processed for flow cytometry analysis. The
cell percent in each cell cycle phase was determined in each
sample (30 000 counts), and comparison was made between the 2
groups.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean
(SEM). In cell proliferation and cytotoxicity experiments,
Dunnett's method of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used
to assess differences among control groups and treatment groups.
Differences in data between two groups in the cell cycle studies
were analyzed using the Student t test. All experiments were
repeated at least three times for reproducibility.
RESULTS
Expression of IL-18R and biological activity of IL-18 on KB cells
Expression of IL-18R was investigated under normal culture
condition and in the presence of IL-18 (10 ng/mL), TNF-α (10 ng/mL), or IL-1β (10 ng/mL), separately or in
various combinations for 24 hours. In normal conditions, without
cytokine stress, (Figure 1(a))
KB cells constitutively expressed
IL-18-receptor (both IL-18Rα and IL-18Rβ)
transcripts. However, IL-18R expression was regulated with
cytokine treatment. By normalization of the band intensity of each
gene to that of G3PDH, IL-18Rα expression was augmented by
IL-18 alone or in combination with TNF-α. In contrast,
TNF-α alone, IL-18 plus IL-1β, and IL-18 plus
TNF-α down-regulated IL-18Rβ expression. Results
from this experiment clearly indicated that the KB cell line is a
specific target for IL-18 by regulating the expression of IL-18R.
Figure 1
Expression of IL-18 receptors and biological activity of
IL-18 on KB cells. (a) Two μg of total RNA samples from KB
cells, with or without cytokines treatment, were subjected to
RT-PCR for IL-18R mRNA expression. (b) KB cells were cultured for
72 hours in media containing increasing concentrations of IL-18.
Relative cell numbers were measured by MTT assays and the relative
cell decrease (mean ± SEM) was then determined. (c)
Cytotoxicity of IL-18 was determined at the end of the
proliferation assay using an LDH detection kit. Asterisk
(*, P < .05) represents significant difference between the treatment
and control groups as analyzed by one-way ANOVA.
To test the biological effect of IL-18 on KB cells, we utilized
nonradioactive MTT assays. IL-18 treatment in KB cells
(Figure 1(b)) resulted in suppression of cell
proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion. As low as 10 pg/mL,
IL-18 caused a 10% reduction of cell numbers compared to the
control group (P < .05). At the highest concentration
(100 ng/mL) of cytokine used in this study, the decrease of
cell numbers reached a maximum of 19%. No further decrease of
cell numbers occurred when the IL-18 dose was doubled to
200 ng/mL. Further analysis on IL-18cytotoxicity, by
measuring LDH release from KB cells at the end of each
proliferation experiment, interestingly, showed no significant
concentration-dependent changes in LDH level
(Figure 1(c)). This indicated that the inhibition of KB
cell proliferation was not mediated by the induction of
cytotoxicity.
Involvement of IL-18 on cell death
To further study the involvement of IL-18 on cell death, we
employed 2 techniques that are capable of illustrating DNA
fragmentation in apoptotic cells. In detection of in situ cell
death, treatment of KB cells with IL-18 resulted in no significant
induction of apoptotic cell death compared to the nontreatment
group (Figures 2(b) and
2(c)). This experiment was
confirmed by using the flow cytometric method. There was no
significant difference in mean fluorescent intensity between the
nontreated control group and the IL-18 treated group (data not
shown). In the DNA laddering analysis (Figure 2(d)),
fragmented DNA was not observed in KB cells treated with IL-18
after 24, 48, or 72 hours. In addition, spontaneous cell death
could not be demonstrated by DNA laddering. This result is
consistent with the in situ apoptotic cell death detection assay,
indicating that IL-18 treatment (in the dose range from
0.01–100 ng/mL) of KB cells did not trigger apoptotic cell
death. In addition, analysis of apoptotic gene expression in KB
cells treated with IL-18 at various time points was also conducted
using RT-PCR. Normalization of the band intensities of bcl-2 and
bax gene to that of G3PDH was used to determine the level of
expression. As we anticipated (2(e)), the
expression of these genes was not altered by IL-18 (10 ng/mL)
treatments at any time point tested, suggesting that IL-18 was not
involved in altering the expression of apoptotic genes in KB
cells.
Figure 2
Involvement of IL-18 in apoptotic cell death of KB cells.
KB cells were cultured for 48 hours on slides, with or without
IL-18. Cells were then subjected to the in situ cell death
detection assay. Apoptotic cells, with a fluorescent
nucleus, were visualized using laser confocal microscopy. (a)
Positive staining control, (b) nontreatment control, (c) IL-18
(100 ng/mL) treatment. In the DNA laddering analysis (d), DNA
samples were extracted from KB cells cultured with or without
IL-18 (0–100 ng/mL) treatment and fractionated by agarose gel
(2%) electrophoresis. (e) Total RNA (2 μg) samples
from KB cells, with or without IL-18 (10 ng/mL) treatment,
were subjected to RT-PCR for expression of apoptotic genes (bcl-2
and bax) along with the gene for G3PDH.
IL-18 modulation of cell cycle progression
Since the inhibitory effect of IL-18 on KB cells was not due to
the induction of cell death, we therefore hypothesized that
inhibition could be attributed to the modulation of cell cycle
progression. To examine the effect of IL-18 on the control of KB
cell cycle progression, the numbers (%) of cells in each stage
(G0/G1, S, and G2/M) of the cell cycle of both control group and
treatment group were compared. We found that the majority of
synchronized cells (approximately 65%) were arrested in the S
phase, leaving a small number of cells in the G2/M phase
(approximately 5%). Within 8 hours of restimulation by 2%
FBS, cells were released from their S phase arrest
(Table 1). However, in the presence of IL-18, the cell
cycle progression was delayed. The number of cells that exited the
S phase was lower in the cytokine treated group compared to the
control (P < .001). At 24 hours after cell cycle restimulation,
the number of cells in the S phase in the IL-18 treated group was
higher than that of the control group (P < .001). At 32 and 48
hours, there was no significant difference in the proportion of
cells in each cell cycle phase between the IL-18-treated and the
control group. Although the S phase arrest phenomenon lasted only
for the first 24 hours, from this evidence we concluded that KB
cells do exhibit a slower proliferation rate in the presence of
IL-18.
Table 1
Effect of IL-18 on KB cell cycle progression.
Synchronized KB cells were restimulated with 2% FBS, with or
without IL-18 (100 ng/mL). Percentage of cells (mean ± SEM)
in each cell cycle phase was determined. Asterisk (*, P < .001) represents significant difference between IL-18 treatment and control
groups as analyzed by T test.
DISCUSSION
Because of its remarkable ability to activate
IFN-γ production by immune cells and to enhance NK
cell activity, IL-18 has been identified as a
good candidate for cancer immunotherapy. To date, there have been
no reports on the direct effect of this cytokine on cancer cells.
In this study, using KB cells as the representative of oral
carcinoma cells, we have demonstrated, for the first time, a
direct in vitro interaction of IL-18 with KB cells on their
proliferation, cell death, and cell cycle progression. IL-18
treatment in KB cells resulted in a reduction of cell
proliferation. Like other solid tumor studies, IL-18 was shown to
exhibit its antitumor properties. In a study of human pancreatic
carcinoma cells, it was demonstrated that during the drug
treatment, cancer cells could produce IL-18, which in turn
enhanced IFN-γ production by T cells [18]. This
indicates that IL-18 acts as a mediator for antitumor mechanisms.
In addition, IL-18 could exert its action in concert with other
cytokines, such as IL-23, or a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor to
enhance antitumor immunity [19,
20]. Interestingly, in a
nonsolid tumor model, this cytokine did not have inhibitory
effects, as shown in humanleukemia cell lines [21].
We have also shown that IL-18 treatment did not lead to cytotoxicity or
induction of apoptotic cell death or alteration of apoptotic gene
expression in KB cells. Similarly, this phenomenon was observed in
a study in vitro IL-18 treatment of B16mousemelanoma cell line
[22]. In a mouse model of
neuroblastoma, IL-18 treatment led
to tumor death, however it is likely caused by the activation of
NK cells in the tumor microenvironment, rather than the direct
effect of IL-18 [23]. In addition,
previous studies have demonstrated that IL-18 promotion of apoptosis maybe mediated by
the induction of TNF and FasL pathways [24-26]
or Fas expression [27].Furthermore in our report; we revealed that mechanism of IL-18
inhibitory effect is attributed to the modulation of cell cycle
progression leading to S phase arrest. It has been demonstrated in
several studies that S phase arrest is often accompanied with the
interference of cell cycle control proteins. For example,
hypoxia-induced S phase arrest in human breast (T-47D) and
cervical (NHIK 3025) cancer cell lines was paralleled with the
down-regulation of cyclin A [28].
A study on rat fibroblast showed that in a low serum condition, the cells entered S phase
arrest with a decrease cyclin A, cyclin B, and cdc2, whereas the
level of cyclin D2, cdk4, and cdk2 persisted at high level
[29]. Though the mechanisms in
KB cells have not been elucidated, it is likely that IL-18 signal transduction may result
in interference with the regulation of the cyclin proteins and/or
the replication of chromosome during S phase. This, therefore,
resulted in a transient delay of a transition of S to M phase,
leading to a slow proliferative rate.Collectively, our findings indicate that suppression of KB cell
proliferation was attributed to the modulation of cell cycle
progression and not to the induction of cell death. Data presented
in this research could provide an insight on how oral carcinoma
cells directly respond to IL-18 as this cytokine is an important
key regulator of anticancer mechanisms, and this could identify a
new role for this cytokine, secondary to the modulation of the
immune response.
Authors: U Kalina; D Kauschat; N Koyama; H Nuernberger; K Ballas; S Koschmieder; G Bug; W K Hofmann; D Hoelzer; O G Ottmann Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: W Hashimoto; T Osaki; H Okamura; P D Robbins; M Kurimoto; S Nagata; M T Lotze; H Tahara Journal: J Immunol Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Anna Carbone; Ulrich Rodeck; Francesco Angelo Mauri; Michela Sozzi; Fabio Gaspari; Carlo Smirne; Adriana Prati; Alfredo Addeo; Anna Novarino; Antonio Robecchi; Oscar Bertetto; Giorgio Emanuelli; Graziella Bellone Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2005-02-02 Impact factor: 4.742