Literature DB >> 23220879

Adaptive Laplacian filtering for sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interfaces.

Jun Lu1, Dennis J McFarland, Jonathan R Wolpaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) are 8-30 Hz oscillations in the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex that change with movement and/or movement imagery. Many brain-computer interface (BCI) studies have shown that people can learn to control SMR amplitudes and can use that control to move cursors and other objects in one, two or three dimensions. At the same time, if SMR-based BCIs are to be useful for people with neuromuscular disabilities, their accuracy and reliability must be improved substantially. These BCIs often use spatial filtering methods such as common average reference (CAR), Laplacian (LAP) filter or common spatial pattern (CSP) filter to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of EEG. Here, we test the hypothesis that a new filter design, called an 'adaptive Laplacian (ALAP) filter', can provide better performance for SMR-based BCIs. APPROACH: An ALAP filter employs a Gaussian kernel to construct a smooth spatial gradient of channel weights and then simultaneously seeks the optimal kernel radius of this spatial filter and the regularization parameter of linear ridge regression. This optimization is based on minimizing the leave-one-out cross-validation error through a gradient descent method and is computationally feasible. MAIN
RESULTS: Using a variety of kinds of BCI data from a total of 22 individuals, we compare the performances of ALAP filter to CAR, small LAP, large LAP and CSP filters. With a large number of channels and limited data, ALAP performs significantly better than CSP, CAR, small LAP and large LAP both in classification accuracy and in mean-squared error. Using fewer channels restricted to motor areas, ALAP is still superior to CAR, small LAP and large LAP, but equally matched to CSP. SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, ALAP may help to improve the accuracy and robustness of SMR-based BCIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220879      PMCID: PMC3602341          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/1/016002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  40 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement.

Authors:  H Ramoser; J Müller-Gerking; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.

Authors:  Jonathan R Wolpaw; Niels Birbaumer; Dennis J McFarland; Gert Pfurtscheller; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms.

Authors:  Fabien Lotte; Cuntai Guan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Combining spatial filters for the classification of single-trial EEG in a finger movement task.

Authors:  Xiang Liao; Dezhong Yao; Dan Wu; Chaoyi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Frequency detection with stability coefficient for steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCIs.

Authors:  Zhenghua Wu; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  CSP patches: an ensemble of optimized spatial filters. An evaluation study.

Authors:  Claudia Sannelli; Carmen Vidaurre; Klaus-Robert Müller; Benjamin Blankertz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication.

Authors:  D J McFarland; L M McCane; S V David; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09

9.  Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland; William A Sarnacki; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Using the electrocorticographic speech network to control a brain-computer interface in humans.

Authors:  Eric C Leuthardt; Charles Gaona; Mohit Sharma; Nicholas Szrama; Jarod Roland; Zac Freudenberg; Jamie Solis; Jonathan Breshears; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  7 in total

1.  The advantages of the surface Laplacian in brain-computer interface research.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Decoding continuous limb movements from high-density epidural electrode arrays using custom spatial filters.

Authors:  A R Marathe; D M Taylor
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Ipsilateral EEG mu rhythm reflects the excitability of uncrossed pathways projecting to shoulder muscles.

Authors:  Keita Hasegawa; Shoko Kasuga; Kenichi Takasaki; Katsuhiro Mizuno; Meigen Liu; Junichi Ushiba
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Entropy-Based Estimation of Event-Related De/Synchronization in Motor Imagery Using Vector-Quantized Patterns.

Authors:  Luisa Velasquez-Martinez; Julián Caicedo-Acosta; Germán Castellanos-Dominguez
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  Brain-machine interface-based training for improving upper extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yu-Lei Xie; Yu-Xuan Yang; Hong Jiang; Xing-Yu Duan; Li-Jing Gu; Wu Qing; Bo Zhang; Yin-Xu Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Decoding Imagined 3D Arm Movement Trajectories From EEG to Control Two Virtual Arms-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Attila Korik; Ronen Sosnik; Nazmul Siddique; Damien Coyle
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Differences in Power Spectral Densities and Phase Quantities Due to Processing of EEG Signals.

Authors:  Raquib-Ul Alam; Haifeng Zhao; Andrew Goodwin; Omid Kavehei; Alistair McEwan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.