Literature DB >> 16951102

Use of distal femoral osteoarticular allografts in limb salvage surgery. Surgical technique.

D Luis Muscolo1, Miguel A Ayerza, Luis A Aponte-Tinao, Maximiliano Ranalletta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As diagnostic and therapeutic techniques improve, patients with a musculoskeletal sarcoma should expect longer survival, fewer complications and side effects, and an improved quality of life. Functional longevity of the reconstruction after resection of the tumor becomes a major concern, especially in young and physically active patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mid-term and long-term survival of reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft in a series of patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of eighty reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft following resection of a bone tumor in seventy-six patients. The mean duration of follow-up was eighty-two months. The rates of survival of the allograft and the joint surface were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Functional and radiographic results were documented according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system at the time of the latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Five patients were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-five allografts in seventy-one patients available for study. Thirteen patients (thirteen allografts) died of tumor-related causes without allograft failure before a two-year radiographic follow-up could be performed. Of the remaining sixty-two allografts, fourteen failed: six failed as a result of infection; four, because of local recurrence; one, because of massive resorption; and three, as a result of fracture. At the time of final follow-up, at a mean of 125 months, forty-eight allografts were still in place. The overall rate of allograft survival was 78% at both five and ten years, and the rate of allograft survival without the need for resurfacing with a knee prosthesis was 71% at both five and ten years. With the numbers available, age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were not found to have a significant effect on the overall allograft survival rates. The patients who retained the original allograft had good or excellent functional and radiographic results.
CONCLUSIONS: The life expectancy for most patients with a highly aggressive or malignant tumor in the distal part of the femur is now several decades. In this study, we found a high rate of survival of distal femoral allograft reconstructions at both five and ten years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951102     DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.00324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  16 in total

1.  Distal femoral osteoarticular allografts: long-term survival, but frequent complications.

Authors:  Patrick C Toy; Jeremy R White; Mark T Scarborough; William F Enneking; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Three-dimensional virtual bone bank system for selecting massive bone allograft in orthopaedic oncology.

Authors:  Zhigang Wu; Jun Fu; Zhen Wang; Xiangdong Li; Jing Li; Yanjun Pei; Guoxian Pei; Dan Li; Zheng Guo; Hongbin Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Enhanced differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on extracellular matrix-containing osteomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Katy Rutledge; Qingsu Cheng; Marina Pryzhkova; Greg M Harris; Ehsan Jabbarzadeh
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  Biomimetic coatings for bone tissue engineering of critical-sized defects.

Authors:  Yuelian Liu; Gang Wu; Klaas de Groot
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Physeal distraction for joint preservation in malignant metaphyseal bone tumors in children.

Authors:  Michael Betz; Charles E Dumont; Bruno Fuchs; G Ulrich Exner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A novel biomimetic polymer scaffold design enhances bone ingrowth.

Authors:  Chris P Geffre; David S Margolis; John T Ruth; Donald W DeYoung; Brandi C Tellis; John A Szivek
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Virtual Planning and Allograft Preparation Guided by Navigation for Reconstructive Oncologic Surgery: A Technical Report.

Authors:  Lucas E Ritacco; Federico E Milano; Germán L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; Domingo L Muscolo; Jose I Albergo; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-10-11

8.  Do irradiated osteo-articular recycled tumor autografts still hold promise for biological joint reconstruction? Our experience with acetabular and proximal ulna ECRT.

Authors:  Manit K Gundavda; Ashik Bary; Manish G Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-12-13

9.  Three-dimensional virtual bone bank system workflow for structural bone allograft selection: a technical report.

Authors:  Lucas Eduardo Ritacco; German Luis Farfalli; Federico Edgardo Milano; Miguel Angel Ayerza; Domingo Luis Muscolo; Luis Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-04-09

10.  Surgical guides (patient-specific instruments) for pediatric tibial bone sarcoma resection and allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Laura Bellanova; Laurent Paul; Pierre-Louis Docquier
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.