BACKGROUND: Complications are frequent with osteoarticular allografts, and their long-term survivorship in the distal femur is unclear. Thus, the benefits of osteoarticular allografting remain controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the frequency of complications in osteoarticular allografts of the distal femur relative to their potential long-term survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients who had osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the distal femur after resection of a malignant or aggressive benign tumor of bone. The minimum followup was 15 months (average, 156 months; range, 15-283 months) for all patients and 98 months (average, 191 months; range, 98-283 months) for the surviving patients. RESULTS: At last followup, 16 of the 26 original allografts were still in place. The overall 5-year and 10-year allograft survival rates were 69% and 63%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates of the joint surface were 79% and 65%, respectively. Eleven patients retained their original osteoarticular allograft without a resurfacing procedure, and nine had been converted to allograft-prosthetic composites. Five patients were converted to megaprostheses and one had an amputation for local recurrence. At last followup, 25 of 26 patients retained a functional limb. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoarticular allograft reconstructions of the distal femur can provide long term survival and restore function but the risk of complications and their physical and monetary costs for patients are not trivial. Lacking the benefit of improved soft tissue attachments inherent in other anatomic sites, we believe this option is most appropriate for restoring bone stock in young patients with expectations of long-term survival.
BACKGROUND: Complications are frequent with osteoarticular allografts, and their long-term survivorship in the distal femur is unclear. Thus, the benefits of osteoarticular allografting remain controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the frequency of complications in osteoarticular allografts of the distal femur relative to their potential long-term survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients who had osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the distal femur after resection of a malignant or aggressive benign tumor of bone. The minimum followup was 15 months (average, 156 months; range, 15-283 months) for all patients and 98 months (average, 191 months; range, 98-283 months) for the surviving patients. RESULTS: At last followup, 16 of the 26 original allografts were still in place. The overall 5-year and 10-year allograft survival rates were 69% and 63%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates of the joint surface were 79% and 65%, respectively. Eleven patients retained their original osteoarticular allograft without a resurfacing procedure, and nine had been converted to allograft-prosthetic composites. Five patients were converted to megaprostheses and one had an amputation for local recurrence. At last followup, 25 of 26 patients retained a functional limb. CONCLUSIONS:Osteoarticular allograft reconstructions of the distal femur can provide long term survival and restore function but the risk of complications and their physical and monetary costs for patients are not trivial. Lacking the benefit of improved soft tissue attachments inherent in other anatomic sites, we believe this option is most appropriate for restoring bone stock in young patients with expectations of long-term survival.
Authors: Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Marc Tompkins; David J Paller; Douglas C Moore; Joseph J Crisco; Richard M Terek Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Joseph A Ippolito; Maximilian Martinez; Jennifer E Thomson; Alexander R Willis; Kathleen S Beebe; Francis R Patterson; Joseph Benevenia Journal: J Orthop Date: 2018-12-20